EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION KIT
Report
- Report Number
- 1036844-2020-00092
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- March 4, 2020
- Date of Event
- February 19, 2020
- Report Date
- February 20, 2020
- Manufacturer
- ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Product Code
- BSO
- PMA / PMN Number
- K140110
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- MD, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
QN#(B)(4). A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW WAS PERFORMED ON THE EPIDURAL NEEDLE WITH NO RELEVANT FINDINGS. A DESIGN HISTORY REVIEW WAS PERFORMED FOR PART # KZ-05500-007 AS A PART OF THIS COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION. THERE HAVE BEEN NO MATERIAL CHANGES FOR THIS PART DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS THAT COULD HAVE LED TO THIS COMPLAINT. A CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME AS THE ROOT CAUSE FOR THIS COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND WITHOUT THE ACTUAL SAMPLE. COMPLAINT VERIFICATION TESTING COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS NO SAMPLE WAS PROVIDED FOR ANALYSIS. A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW WAS PERFORMED ON THE EPIDURAL NEEDLE WITH NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST A MANUFACTURING RELATED CAUSE. THEREFORE, THE POTENTIAL CAUSE OF THIS COMPLAINT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND WITHOUT THE SAMPLE.
THE REPORT STATES: IN PLACING A LABOR EPIDURAL, THERE WAS SOME DIFFICULTY DUE TO PATIENT MOVEMENT AND POOR POSITIONING. THERE WAS CONTACT WITH BONE, BUT THE NEEDLE WAS REDIRECTED TO FIND THE EPIDURAL SPACE. NEVERTHELESS, THERE WAS A GOOD LOSS OF RESISTANCE (CLEAR INDICATION THAT THE NEEDLE WAS IN THE EPIDURAL SPACE), AND MEDICATION WAS EASILY DOSED THROUGH THE NEEDLE. HOWEVER, WHEN I TRIED TO PASS THE EPIDURAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE, THE CATHETER MOVEMENT WAS BLOCKED AND WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TIP OF THE TUOHY NEEDLE. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, I ABORTED THE PROCEDURE AND REMOVED THE NEEDLE, WHERE I FOUND THAT THE BEVEL-TIP WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BENT, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE PLASTIC CATHETER TO PASS THROUGH. I HAD TO START OVER AGAIN WITH A NEW NEEDLE/KIT. EVENTUALLY, THE 2ND KIT ALLOWED PLACEMENT OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER, BUT THE DELAY OF TREATMENT CAUSED ADDITIONAL PAIN FOR THE PATIENT.
(B)(4). THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION. TELEFLEX WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR AND TREND RELATED EVENTS.
THE REPORT STATES: IN PLACING A LABOR EPIDURAL, THERE WAS SOME DIFFICULTY DUE TO PATIENT MOVEMENT AND POOR POSITIONING. THERE WAS CONTACT WITH BONE, BUT THE NEEDLE WAS REDIRECTED TO FIND THE EPIDURAL SPACE. NEVERTHELESS, THERE WAS A GOOD LOSS OF RESISTANCE (CLEAR INDICATION THAT THE NEEDLE WAS IN THE EPIDURAL SPACE), AND MEDICATION WAS EASILY DOSED THROUGH THE NEEDLE. HOWEVER, WHEN I TRIED TO PASS THE EPIDURAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE, THE CATHETER MOVEMENT WAS BLOCKED AND WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TIP OF THE TUOHY NEEDLE. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, I ABORTED THE PROCEDURE AND REMOVED THE NEEDLE, WHERE I FOUND THAT THE BEVEL-TIP WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BENT, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE PLASTIC CATHETER TO PASS THROUGH. I HAD TO START OVER AGAIN WITH A NEW NEEDLE/KIT. EVENTUALLY, THE 2ND KIT ALLOWED PLACEMENT OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER, BUT THE DELAY OF TREATMENT CAUSED ADDITIONAL PAIN FOR THE PATIENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250536 | EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION KIT | ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION CATHETER | BSO | ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. | 23F19F0291 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |