INRATIO
Report
- Report Number
- 2954730-2006-00489
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- September 8, 2006
- Date of Event
- September 1, 2006
- Report Date
- September 5, 2006
- Manufacturer
- HEMOSENSE, INC.
- Product Code
- GIS
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- UNKNOWN
Narratives
INRATIO PRECISION DATA PROVIDED BY END-USER LOT 060102: IN 2006: FIRST TEST INR = 4.3; SECOND TEST INR = 4.;1 MEAN = 4.2; SD= 0.14, % CV = 3.3%. THE %CV IS LESS THAN OUR EQUAL TO 20%. PER INTERNAL PROCEDURE, TR, THE PRECISION PASSES THE CRITERIA FOR PRECISION. THE TEST IS CONSIDERED PRECISE AND NO FURTHER TESTING IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. DISCREPANT RESULTS (ACCURACY) COMPARISON OF INRATIO TEST WITH LAB RESULTS PROVIDED BY END-USER AT TIME COMPLAINT WAS FILED: DATE:2006; INRATIO:3.1(2PM); LAB:4.3(9:30PM); MEAN:3.7; CONFIDENCE LIMITS:2.2-5.3; INRATIO:3.1(2PM); LAB:4.1(9:30PM); MEAN:3.6; CONFIDENCE LIMITS:2.2-5.3. PER INTERNAL PROCEDURE, TR, THE MEAN OF THE INRATIO METER AND COMPARATIVE SYSTEM INR WERE CALCULATED. BOTH INRATIO AND LAB VALUES ARE WITHIN THE CONFIDENCE LIMITS FOR INR TESTING. THE RESULTS ARE NOT CONSIDERED DISCREPANT WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE DOCUMENTED VARIABILITY FOR INR TESTING. THEREFORE, FURTHER TESTING IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. THE TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN INRATIO AND LAB WAS > 3 HOURS. PER TR, THE COMPARISON CONSIDERED INVALID.
CALLER ALLEGED DISCREPANT RESULTS COMPARED WITH THE LAB. RESULTS AS FOLLOWS: DATE: IN 2006; INRATIO:3.1(2PM); LAB:4.3(9:30PM); INRATIO:3.1(2PM); LAB:4.1(9:30PM). CALLER ALLEGED IMPRECISION WITH INRATIO. RESULTS AS FOLLOWS: IN 2006; FIRST TEST INR = 4.3; SECOND TEST INR = 4.1.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INRATIO | PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST | GIS | HEMOSENSE, INC. | * | 060102 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | * |