NEUROFORM MICRODELIVERY STENT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 6000078-2007-00120
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 26, 2007
- Date of Event
- February 27, 2007
- Report Date
- February 27, 2007
- Manufacturer
- NEUROVASCULAR, A DIVISION OF BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
- Product Code
- NJE
- PMA / PMN Number
- H020002/S4
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NY, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE DEVICE IN QUESTION DEPLOYED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. NO DEFECTS WERE FOUND ON THE STENT AND MICRODELIVERY CATHETER COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE IN QUESTION. PMA/510 (K) #:H020002/S5. THE DEVICE IN QUESTION (STENT) WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) REVIEW, SIMILAR COMPLAINTS REVIEW, INITIAL CONDITION EXAM, VISUAL/MICROSCOPIC EXAM, DIMENSIONAL CHECK AND FUNCTIONAL CHECK WAS PERFORMED AS PART OF THE DEVICE EVALUATION. THE DHR REVIEW FOUND ONE NONCONFORMANCE, DEEMED UNRELATED, CONFIRMING THAT THIS DEVICE MET ALL REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. THE SIMILAR COMPLAINTS REVIEW REVEALED THAT NO OTHER COMPLAINTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED ON THIS BATCH. THE DEVICE IN QUESTION WAS RETURNED IN ITS POUCH. VISUAL /MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THE STENT WAS LOADED IN THE MICRODELIVERY CATHETER. THE STABILIZER HAD SEPARATED AT ITS PROXIMAL JUNCTION; THE REMAINING PORTION WAS NOT RETURNED. NO DEFECTS WERE OBSERVED ON THE STENT AND MICRODELIVERY CATHETER. MEASURABLE DIMENSIONS WERE FOUND TO BE WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE FUNCTIONAL CHECK, THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. BECAUSE THE COMPLAINT RATE FOR THE REPORTED ISSUE HAS EXCEEDED THE LEVELS DETAILED IN THE RISK MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS PRODUCT, A CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION PLAN HAS BEEN INITIATED TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE AND ADDRESS THE ISSUE. BASED ON THE FACTS AND FINDINGS, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CANNOT CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE USER'S EXPERIENCE. NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN.
IT WAS REPORTED IN 2007, THAT "DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS MISDEPLOYED." CLARIFICATION RECEIVED ON APRIL 2, 2007: THE ANATOMY WAS VERY TORTUOUS. BEFORE GETTING THE DEVICE (STENT) TO THE TARGET SITE, ENERGY HAD BUILT UP IN THE SYSTEM. WHILE TRYING TO GET THE DEVICE TO THE TARGET SITE, THE PHYSICIAN INADVERTENTLY BUMPED THE DEVICE, AND AS A RESULT TO THE TENSION BUILT IN THE SYSTEM, THE STENT STARTED TO DEPLOY. ONLY THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STENT WAS SEEN STARTING TO OPEN, AS THE REST OF THE STENT WAS STILL IN THE MICRODELIVERY CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN IMMEDIATELY WITHDREW THE STENT SYSTEM WITHOUT COMPLICATION. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AND COMPLICATIONS FROM THIS AND IS FINE. THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE PARTIALLY DEPLOYED STENT BACK INTO THE MICRODELIVERY CATHETER OUTSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEUROFORM MICRODELIVERY STENT SYSTEM | INTRACRANIAL, NEUROVASCULAR STENT | NJE | NEUROVASCULAR, A DIVISION OF BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION | SNF33520 | 9269528 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YR | GUIDEWIRE (UNKNOWN MFR) |