SWIFTHOOK
Report
- Report Number
- 3009481053-2018-00049
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- December 13, 2018
- Date of Event
- November 18, 2018
- Report Date
- December 13, 2018
- Manufacturer
- HANDICARE AB
- Product Code
- FSA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
INVESTIGATION: TO FIND THE UNDERLYING CAUSE FOR THE PRODUCT FAILURE, THE BROKEN SAMPLE WAS PHOTOGRAPHED AND SENT TO MANUFACTURER R&D DEPARTMENT FOR ANALYSIS. THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS SURROUNDING THE PRODUCT WERE REVIEWED, AND IT SHOWS THAT THE PRODUCT IS MADE BY INDUSTRIAL FORGING. MATERIAL COMPOSITION STRUCTURE FLAWS USING THIS MANUFACTURING METHOD IS VERY RARE. ACCORDING TO THE PICTURES TAKEN OF THE BROKEN SAMPLE, IT WAS QUICKLY CONCLUDED THAT IT WAS FROM AN OLDER DESIGN THAN THE CURRENT ONE IN PRODUCTION. THE CURRENT DESIGN DATES TO AUGUST OF 2011 WHERE IT WAS REVISED AND WAS IMPROVED WITH A FEATURE TO INCREASE ITS SAFETY. THIS CAME INTO PRODUCTION SHORTLY AFTER. THE OTHER SAMPLES OF THE OLD DESIGN FOUND IN THE QUARANTINE WERE SENT TO THIRD PARTY TESTING LAB FOR DEEPER ANALYSIS. THE ANALYSIS WAS SPLIT INTO TWO TESTS; TENSILE STRENGTH TEST AND MATERIAL COMPOSITION ANALYSIS. DURING THE TENSILE STRENGTH TEST, SAMPLE A WITHSTOOD 30.7KN BEFORE FRACTURE VERSUS SAMPLE B WHICH WITHSTOOD 23.3KN. THE MATERIAL COMPOSITION FOUND IN THE MATERIAL ANALYSIS PROVED SAMPLE A TO BE MATCHED OR SIMILAR, SAMPLE B MATCHED TO S355 OR SIMILAR. CONCLUSION: ALTHOUGH THE SAMPLES HAD DIFFERENT MATERIAL COMPOSITIONS, THE FACTS STAND AS THE MINIMUM FORCE BEFORE FRACTURE WAS 23.3KN. LN COMPARISON TO THE PATIENT WEIGHT 131KG (COLLECTED FOR INVESTIGATION) WHICH IS ALMOST 18 TIMES HIGHER THAN THE PATIENT WEIGHT. THE ANALYSIS REPORT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THE PRODUCT SWIFTHOOK IS PROPERLY DIMENSIONED FOR ITS PURPOSE AND SHOULD BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND THE LOAD. EVEN THOUGH THE MATERIAL IS DURABLE ENOUGH TO WITHSTAND HIGHER LOADS, THE FAILURE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED IN THIS INCIDENT. THE PRODUCT SWIFTHOOK HAS BEEN SOLD FOR MANY YEARS ON THE MARKET AND HAS FAILED ONLY DURING THIS EVENT. BY THIS, THE CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN THAT THE PROBABILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF SWIFTHOOK IS DETERMINED TO BE EVEN LESS THAN 0.005%.
THE USER WAS BEING TRANSFERRED FROM BED TO WHEELCHAIR WHEN THE SWIFTHOOK (COMPONENT) WHICH ATTACHES THE SLING BAR TO THE MOBILE LIFT FRACTURED. THE PATIENT FELL AS THE SLING BAR AND SLING DETACHED FROM THE MOBILE LIFT, BUT DID NOT SUSTAIN ANY INJURY FROM THE EVENT.
HANDICARE AB HAS INITIATED AN INVESTIGATION FOR THIS EVENT. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE PENDING INVESTIGATION RESULTS.
THE USER WAS BEING TRANSFERRED FROM BED TO WHEELCHAIR WHEN THE SWIFTHOOK (COMPONENT) WHICH ATTACHES THE SLING BAR TO THE MOBILE LIFT FRACTURED. THE PATIENT FELL AS THE SLING BAR AND SLING DETACHED FROM THE MOBILE LIFT, BUT DID NOT SUSTAIN ANY INJURY FROM THE EVENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000992 | SWIFTHOOK | PATIENT LIFT | FSA | HANDICARE AB | 70200008 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |