RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX
Report
- Report Number
- 9612164-2018-02861
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 22, 2018
- Date of Event
- October 23, 2017
- Report Date
- October 22, 2018
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC IRELAND
- Product Code
- NIQ
- PMA / PMN Number
- P110013
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NL
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
AVERAGE AGE. AVERAGE GENDER. DATE ARTICLE WAS ACCEPTED. JOURNAL ARTICLE: "CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF COMPLEX REAL-WORLD DIABETIC PATIENTS TREATED WITH AMPHILIMUS SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS OR ZOTAROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS: A SINGLE-CENTER REGISTRY." RIK ROZEMEIJER A, DANIELA BENEDETTO A, ADRIAAN O. KRAAIJEVELD A, MICHIEL VOSKUIL A, MÈRA STEIN A, LEO TIMMERS A, SASKIA Z. RITTERSMA A, PIERFRANCESCO AGOSTONI A,B, PIETER A. DOEVENDANS A,C, PIETER R. STELLA CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 19 (2018) 521¿525 HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.CARREV.2017.10.011 1553-8389/© 2017 ELSEVIER INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
OBJECTIVE: TO ASSESS CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF AMPHILIMUS SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS (A-SES) AS COMPARED TO ZOTAROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS (ZES) IN COMPLEX REAL-WORLD DIABETIC PATIENTS. BACKGROUND: PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS REPRESENT ONE OF THE MOST CHALLENGING SCENARIOS WITH HIGH RATES OF RESTENOSIS AND STENT THROMBOSIS IN THE CURRENT ERA OF DRUG-ELUTING STENTS. HENCE, WE ASSESSED THE SAFETY OF A-SES VERSUS ZES IN COMPLEX DIABETIC PATIENTS. METHODS: IN THIS OBSERVATIONAL STUDY, WE ANALYZED ALL CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS REFERRED TO OUR CENTER FROM NOVEMBER 2012 TO NOVEMBER 2014. THE PRIMARY OUTCOME WAS TARGET-LESION FAILURE AT 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP. RESULTS: A TOTAL OF 165 CONSECUTIVE DIABETIC PATIENTS UNDERWENT PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION WITH A-SES OR ZES FOR STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IN OUR TERTIARY CENTER. USING THE KAPLAN MEIER METHOD THE CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF TARGET-LESION FAILURE WAS 6.7% (5.9% A-SES VERSUS 7.5% ZES, P = 0.19) AT 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP. EVENT-FREE SURVIVAL AT 1 YEAR FOLLOW-UP WAS SIMILAR (89.4% A-SES VS. 83.3% ZES, P = 0.29). INTERESTINGLY, WE DID NOT FIND ANY CASES OF DEFINITE-, AND ONLY ONE CASE OF PROBABLE STENT THROMBOSIS IN THIS HIGH RISK COHORT. CONCLUSION: IN THIS REAL-WORLD REGISTRY, A-SES AND ZES SEEMS TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH PROMISING 1-YEAR CLINICAL SAFETY OUTCOMES FOLLOWING PCI IN A CONTEMPORARY COHORT OF HIGH-RISK DIABETIC PATIENTS. OUR RESULTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED HYPOTHESIS GENERATING, AS THE CLINICAL SAFETY OF A-SES HAS TO BE CONFIRMED IN A LARGE TRIAL. THE DEVICE USED WAS RESOLUTE INTEGRITY AND ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTED WERE MI, TVR, STENT THROMBOSIS, GI BLEED, AND OCCLUSION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 832429 | RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX | STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING | NIQ | MEDTRONIC IRELAND |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 YR | Required Intervention |