PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Report
- Report Number
- 2210968-2018-75631
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- September 5, 2018
- Report Date
- August 17, 2018
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON INC.
- Product Code
- OTP
- PMA / PMN Number
- K013718
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- PL
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
(B)(4). THIS REPORT IS RELATED TO A JOURNAL ARTICLE, THEREFORE NO PRODUCT WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE BATCH HISTORY RECORDS CANNOT BE REVIEWED AS THE LOT NUMBER HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. TO DATE NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN PROVIDED. IF FURTHER DETAILS ARE RECEIVED AT A LATER DATE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SENT. WERE THE CASES DISCUSSED IN THIS ARTICLE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO ETHICON? IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLAINT REFERENCE NUMBER. DOES THE SURGEON BELIEVE THAT ETHICON PRODUCTS INVOLVED CAUSED AND/OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ARTICLE? DOES THE SURGEON BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY DEFICIENCY WITH THE ETHICON PRODUCTS USED IN THIS PROCEDURE? CITATION: INT UROGYNECOL J. 2015; 26: 1815 1820. DOI: 10.1007/S00192-015-2772-Z. [(B)(4)].
IT WAS REPORTED VIA JOURNAL ARTICLE: "TITLE: RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PROLIFT AND ELEVATE ANTERIOR VAGINAL MESH PROCEDURES: 18-MONTH CLINICAL OUTCOME". AUTHORS: ARTUR ROGOWSKI, PRZEMYSLAW BIENKOWSKI, DARIUSZ TARWACKI, MONIKA SZAFAROWSKA, JERZY SAMOCHOWIEC, HALINA SIENKIEWICZ-JAROSZ, MALGORZATA JERZAK, WLODZIMIERZ BARANOWSKI. CITATION: INT UROGYNECOL J. 2015; 26: 1815 1820. DOI: 10.1007/S00192-015-2772-Z. THERE ARE FEW DIRECT COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE FIRST-GENERATION TROCAR-GUIDED AND THE SECOND GENERATION SINGLE-INCISION MESH SYSTEMS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANTERIOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (POP). THE PURPOSE OF THIS RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW WAS TO COMPARE 18-MONTH OPERATIVE SUCCESS IN FEMALE PATIENTS WHO HAD UNDERGONE POP SURGERY WITH THE IMPLANTATION OF THE GYNECARE PROLIFT ANTERIOR MESH (ETHICON; N-52; AGE: 68.5 ± 7.9 YEARS; BMI: 27.3 ± 3.0) OR THE ANTERIOR ELEVATE MESH (N-62; AGE: 66.1 ± 7.4; BMI: 28.3 ± 3.3). IN THE PROLIFT GROUP, REPORTED COMPLICATIONS INCLUDED VAGINAL EXPOSURE (N-4), DE NOVO STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE (N-6), DE NOVO OVERACTIVE BLADDER (N-1), POST-OPERATIVE PELVIC FLOOR PAIN (N-6), AND POST-OPERATIVE DYSPAREUNIA (N-6). THE AUTHORS FOUND A SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER RISK OF VAGINAL EXPOSURE AFTER THE PROLIFT MESH IMPLANTATION. THIS MAY BE DUE TO A LARGER SIZE OF THE PROLIFT MESH RESULTING IN INSUFFICIENT INTRAOPERATIVE MESH SPREADING OR MESH FOLDING SOON AFTER SURGERY. THE RESULTS SHOWED THAT THE USE OF THE ELEVATE SYSTEM IN PATIENTS WITH ANTERIOR COMPARTMENT PROLAPSE RESULTS IN FEWER MESH EROSIONS, BUT SIMILAR EFFICACY, COMPARED WITH THE PROLIFT MESH.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 690115 | PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT | MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC | OTP | ETHICON INC. | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |