EXTRACTION BAG FOR MIS
Report
- Report Number
- 3006425876-2018-00384
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- June 21, 2018
- Date of Event
- May 28, 2018
- Report Date
- May 29, 2018
- Manufacturer
- TELEFLEX MEDICAL
- Product Code
- GCJ
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SF
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4). AS THE LOT NUMBER OF THE DEFECTIVE PRODUCT WAS REPORTED, THE DHR REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINED LOT COULD BE COMPLETED. FROM THE REVIEWED DATA IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE COMPLAINED JOT WAS PRODUCED IN DECEMBER 2016. THERE WERE SCRAPPED 20 PIECES DURING PRODUCTION OF COMPLAINED JOT IN TOTAL. 8 PIECES WERE SCRAPPED DURING OPERATION "SEAL AND FUNCTION INSPECTION (QC}", 2 PIECES WERE SCRAPPED DURING OPERATION "PRINTING LABELS ON BOXES" AND 10 PIECES WERE USED AS BIO SAMPLES. IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT 1 SHIPPING BOX WITH 220 PCS OF THIS LOT WAS DAMAGED IN STERILIZATION COMPANY BBF. THIS BOX WAS RETURNED BACK TO ZDAR FACILITY, NC 60037720 WAS OPENED AND THIS BOX WAS REPACKED UNDER THIS NC. 195 PCS WERE SCRAPPED BECAUSE OF DAMAGED POUCHES WITH PRODUCTS AND 25 PCS WERE RELEASED TO THE MARKET. THIS ISSUE HAS NO IMPACT TO THE REPORTED DEFECT. INCOMING INSPECTION AND FINAL INSPECTION RECORDS OF RAW MATERIAL/SEMI-FINISHED MATERIAL WERE REVIEWED. LOTS WERE CHECKED BY QC INSPECTION AND WERE RELEASED WITHOUT ANY DEFECT OBSERVED. FINAL INSPECTION RECORD OF COMPLAINED LOT WAS REVIEWED. LOT WAS CHECKED BY FINAL QC INSPECTION AND WAS RELEASED WITHOUT ANY DEFECT OBSERVED. CUSTOMER COMPLAINT REGARDING MEMOBAG PRODUCT WAS REPORTED. AS THE LOT NUMBER OF THE DEFECTIVE PRODUCT WAS REPORTED, THE DHR REVIEW WAS COMPLETED. THE REVIEW OF OHR REVEALED NO PRODUCTION ISSUES AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE OF THE COMPLAINED LOT. THE REPORTED DEFECT CANNOT BE CONFIRMED BECAUSE THE DEFECTIVE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED BACK TO EXAMINATION. IFU 940268-000000 SAYS THAT LARGE TISSUE SPECIMENS MAY NEED TO BE CUT INTO SMALLER PIECES FOR REMOVAL. FURTHERMORE, IT SAYS THAT THE MEMOBAG IS REMOVING THROUGH THE TROCAR INCISION SIDE. IF THE CONTENTS OF THE MEMOBAG ARE TOO LARGER TO PASS THROUGH THE TROCAR INCISION, THE INCISION MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED TO FACILITATE REMOVAL OF THE MEMOBAG. IFU SAYS THAT THE CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN AT ALL TIMES TO AVOID CONTACT OF THE BAG WITH SHARP INSTRUMENTS, CUTTING DEVICES, MORCELLATORS, ELECTROCAUTERY OR LASER DELIVERY DEVICES. IN THE EVENT, THAT ONE OF ABOVE ISSUES IS NOT FULFILLED, THE COMPLAINED DEFECT (BROKEN BAG) CAN BE CAUSED. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS COMPLAINT CANNOT BE CLEARLY DETERMINED BECAUSE OF POOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE REPORTED DEFECT AND UNAVAILABLE DEFECTIVE DEVICE. AS THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS COMPLAINT WAS NOT DETERMINED, NO CORRECTIVE I PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN PRODUCTION ARE DEEMED NECESSARY TO INTRODUCE.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MEMOBAG BURST AT THE BOTTOM WITH THE SPECIMEN IN IT, WHEN THE DOCTOR WANTED TO REMOVE IT.
(B)(4). THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION. TELEFLEX WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR AND TREND RELATED EVENTS.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MEMOBAG BURST AT THE BOTTOM WITH THE SPECIMEN IN IT, WHEN THE DOCTOR WANTED TO REMOVE IT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 468225 | EXTRACTION BAG FOR MIS | GCJ | TELEFLEX MEDICAL | 71F16L1861 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |