TEOSYAL RHA 3
Report
- Report Number
- 3005975625-2017-00003
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- January 30, 2018
- Date of Event
- November 27, 2017
- Report Date
- January 5, 2018
- Manufacturer
- TEOXANE S.A.
- Product Code
- LMH
- PMA / PMN Number
- P170002
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IT
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
SKIN NECROSIS ARE WELL KNOWN AND DOCUMENTED ADVERSE REACTIONS AS PART OF HYALURONIC ACID-BASED DERMAL FILLERS INJECTIONS. THEY ARE RELATED TO THE ACCIDENTAL INJECTION OF THE PRODUCT INSIDE OR CLOSE TO A BLOOD VESSEL LEADING TO AN OCCLUSION OR A COMPRESSION AND BLOCKING THE BLOOD FLOW, GENERALLY REFERED TO AS VASCULAR COMPLICATION. IF THE VASCULAR COMPLICATION IS NOT DETECTED/DIAGNOSED AND TREATED TIMELY, IT CAN LEAD TO A SKIN NECROSIS. THE RISK OF VASCULAR COMPLICATION AND SKIN NECROSIS ARE MENTIONED IN THE PRODUCT LABELLING. LITERATURE DATA: - DELORENZI C. COMPLICATIONS OF INJECTABLE FILLERS, PART 2: VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS. AESTHET SURG J. 2014;34(4):584-600. - FUNT D, PAVICIC T. DERMAL FILLERS IN AESTHETICS: AN OVERVIEW OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND TREATMENT APPROACHES. CLIN COSMET INVESTIG DERMATOL 2013;6:295-316. - MANAFI A, BARIKBIN B, MANAFI A, HAMEDI ZS, MOGHADAM SA. NASAL ALAR NECROSIS FOLLOWING HYALURONIC ACID INJECTION INTO NASOLABIAL FOLDS: A CASE REPORT. WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY. 2015;4(1).
THIS EVENT TOOK PLACE OUTSIDE THE U.S., IN (B)(6). THE INITIAL REPORTER INFORMED TEOXANE S.A. ON 12/05/2017 THAT AN EVENT OCCURRED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DETAILS. ON 12/11/2017 COMPLEMENTARY INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED, INCLUDING PICTURES SHOWING A SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTION, THAT OCCURRED THE DAY THE INJECTION TOOK PLACE, AFTER INJECTION OF THE PRODUCT INTO THE UPPER LIP. THE PRACTITIONER REPORTS THE OCCURRENCE OF SEVERE EDEMA AND PAIN, HOWEVER IN OUR OPINION THE DESCRIPTION MORE LIKELY MATCHED WITH A SKIN NECROSIS FOLLOWING A VASCULAR COMPLICATION. CONSIDERING THE PROVIDED INFORMATION, THE APPEARANCE OF THE REACTION, AND THE INITIAL REPORTER'S DIAGNOSIS, A THIRD OPINION WAS DEMANDED TO A MEDICAL EXPERT. THE MEDICAL EXPERT'S ADVICE CONCURRED WITH THE CONCLUSION THAT THE INCIDENT WAS RELATED TO A SKIN NECROSIS (CAUSED BY AN ACCIDENTAL INJECTION OF THE PRODUCT INSIDE OR CLOSE TO A BLOOD VESSEL). HOWEVER THE INITIAL REPORTER DID NOT AGREE WITH THIS ADVICE, STATING THAT IT WAS A VENOUS STASIS (WHICH IS A VASCULAR COMPLICATION), AND THAT THE SITUATION STARTED TO IMPROVE UNDER STEROIDS AND ANTIBIOTICS TREATMENT (INFORMATION DATED (B)(6) 2017). NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER REGARDING THE PATIENT'S RECOVERY AFTER THE (B)(6) 2017.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71584 | TEOSYAL RHA 3 | HYALURONIC ACID DERMAL FILLER GEL | LMH | TEOXANE S.A. | NOT APPLICABLE | TP27L-164911A |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other |