FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

NAVIO

MDR report key: 7211384 · Received January 22, 2018

Report

Report Number
3010266064-2018-00001
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
January 22, 2018
Date of Event
January 8, 2018
Report Date
September 28, 2022
Manufacturer
BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES, DIV OF SMITH AND NEPHEW
Product Code
OLO
PMA / PMN Number
K160537
Removal / Correction Number
Z-1634-2020
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
NJ, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER
Health Professional
N

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

DISCLAIMER: SMITH & NEPHEW IS SUBMITTING THE ABOVE REPORT TO COMPLY WITH 21 C.F.R. PART 803, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTING REGULATION. THE REPORT IS BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED BY SMITH & NEPHEW, WHICH THE COMPANY MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE DATE THE REPORT WAS REQUIRED BY FDA. THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION THAT THE DEVICE, SMITH & NEPHEW, OR ITS EMPLOYEES, CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. NOR DOES THIS REPORT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY FDA, SMITH & NEPHEW OR ITS EMPLOYEES, THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE DEVICE, SMITH & NEPHEW OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. SECOND EVENT WAS RECORDED ON REPORT NUMBER (B)(4). CORRECTION: B1 AND H1 WERE UPDATED TO REPORT TYPE ADVERSE EVENT.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THE NAVIO SOFT TISSUE PROTECTOR, (PN 101092), USED IN TREATMENT WAS RETURNED FOR A PRIOR INVESTIGATION AND DISCARDED. A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE DEVICE WAS ESTABLISHED. A PHOTO OF THE DEVICE FROM THE PRIOR INVESTIGATION SHOWED THAT THE BONE PIN WAS STUCK IN THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. DHR REVIEW FOUND THAT NO CONDITIONS THAT COULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED EVENT WERE FOUND. THE REPORTED PRODUCT MET MANUFACTURING SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO BEING RELEASED FOR DISTRIBUTION. A COMPLAINT HISTORY REVIEW FOUND SIMILAR REPORTS, THIS ISSUE WILL CONTINUE TO BE MONITORED. THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE GUIDE PROVIDES INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. SPECIFICALLY, THE GUIDE PROVIDES INSTRUCTION ON HOW TO PREPARE THE BONE PIN INSERTION LOCATION ON THE PATIENT AND HOW TO INSERT THE TISSUE PROTECTOR WITHIN THAT LOCATION. THE COMPLAINT DOES NOT SUGGEST THAT THE USER DEVIATED FROM THESE INSTRUCTIONS. MOREOVER, AS PART OF THE FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION IN TR0979 THAT REPLICATED THE ISSUE, THE TEST OPERATOR FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE GUIDE AND EXPERIENCED THE BONE PIN GETTING STUCK IN THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. ACCORDINGLY, PRODUCT LABELING HAS BEEN RULED OUT AS A CAUSE OF THE COMPLAINT. THIS FAILURE IS AN IDENTIFIED FAILURE MODE WITHIN THE RISK FILE. BASED ON PRIOR COMPLAINTS RECEIVED, IT IS LIKELY THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED DUE TO THE REPORTED FAILURE. THE MALFUNCTION IS DUE TO A DESIGN ISSUE DUE TO THE INNER DIAMETER OF THE TISSUE PROTECTOR LUMEN DIAMETER RELATIVE TO THE MAJOR DIAMETER OF THE BONE PIN. BINDING OF THE BONE SCREW TO THE TISSUE PROTECTOR IS PRIMARILY DUE TO TISSUE BEING WRAPPED AROUND THE THREADS. HOWEVER, INITIAL PIN MISALIGNMENT AND BENDING OF THE PIN ARE ALSO CONTRIBUTING FACTORS. HHE-2020-12-PL AND CAPA 200017 WERE OPENED AS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. AS A RESULT OF THE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION, WE HAVE THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED THE COMPLAINT PER THE CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY 21 CFR 820.198(D).

Description of Event or Problem · 0

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PLACEMENT OF THE TIBIAL ARRAY PINS, A PIN BECAME LODGED IN THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. THIS WAS REMOVED MANUALLY HOWEVER THE PIN WAS UNABLE TO BE DISLODGED FROM THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. A SECOND TRAY WAS OPENED AND ANOTHER TISSUE PROTECTOR WAS TRIED. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PLACE THE ARRAY PIN WITH THE SECOND TISSUE PROTECTOR, THE PIN ALSO BECAME LODGED IN THE PROTECTOR. THE PINS WERE PLACED MANUALLY AND THE CASE PROCEEDED WITHOUT INCIDENT.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PLACEMENT OF THE TIBIAL ARRAY PINS, A PIN BECAME LODGED IN THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. THIS WAS REMOVED MANUALLY HOWEVER THE PIN WAS UNABLE TO BE DISLODGED FROM THE TISSUE PROTECTOR. A SECOND TRAY WAS OPENED AND ANOTHER TISSUE PROTECTOR WAS TRIED. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PLACE THE ARRAY PIN WITH THE SECOND TISSUE PROTECTOR, THE PIN ALSO BECAME LODGED IN THE PROTECTOR. THE PINS WERE PLACED MANUALLY AND THE CASE PROCEEDED WITHOUT INCIDENT.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
52487 NAVIO STEROTAXIC INSTRUMENT, COMPUTER ASSISTED, PRODUCT CODE: OLO OLO BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES, DIV OF SMITH AND NEPHEW NPFS02000

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 51 YR Female Required Intervention