THORATEC CENTRIMAG PRIMARY CONSOLE
Report
- Report Number
- 2916596-2017-02433
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 24, 2017
- Date of Event
- May 14, 2017
- Report Date
- October 24, 2017
- Manufacturer
- THORATEC SWITZERLAND GMBH
- Product Code
- DWA
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- UK
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THE PATIENT¿S WEIGHT WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE REFERENCED 1ST PRIMARY CONSOLE, MOTOR, AND FLOW PROBE WERE REPORTED UNDER MEDWATCH MFR REPORT # 2916596-2017-01150. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER (UDI) # (DEVICE IDENTIFIER): DEVICE WAS MANUFACTURED PRIOR TO THE UDI LABELING IMPLEMENTATION. THE PRIMARY CONSOLE IS NOT A SINGLE USE DEVICE. APPROXIMATE AGE OF THE DEVICE IS 3 YEARS, 3 MONTHS (CALCULATED FROM THE MANUFACTURE DATE OF THE PRIMARY CONSOLE). THE EVENT OCCURRED AT (B)(6). THE REPORT OF NO FLOW INDICATION WAS ONLY SEEN AND CONFIRMED IN THE LOG FILE OF THE BACKUP PRIMARY CONSOLE. WHILE THE INVOLVED MOTOR WAS STILL OPERATED BY THE FIRST PRIMARY CONSOLE, THE LOG FILE ENTRIES SHOWED THAT FLOW WAS DISPLAYED AS INTENDED. HOWEVER, AFTER SWITCHING THE INVOLVED MOTOR TO THE BACKUP PRIMARY CONSOLE, FLOW VALUES WERE ONLY LOGGED SPORADICALLY, BUT NEVERTHELESS SHOWED THAT FLOW WAS PRESENT. THE BACKUP PRIMARY CONSOLE ALERTED ¿FLOW SIGNAL INTERRUPTED: F2¿ MULTIPLE TIMES. ACCORDING TO THE LOG FILE ENTRIES, THE RETURNED MOTOR ALWAYS OPERATED AS INTENDED AND, WHEN TWO PRESSURE SENSORS WERE CONNECTED TO THE BACKUP PRIMARY CONSOLE, PRESSURE VALUES WERE ALWAYS DISPLAYED CORRECTLY. THE BEHAVIOR SEEN IN THE LOG FILE CONFIRMED THE REPORTED EVENT. THE SUSPECT NO FLOW ISSUE COULD NOT BE REPRODUCED DURING THE MANUFACTURER¿S INVESTIGATION. BOTH PRIMARY CONSOLES WERE EACH TESTED TOGETHER WITH THE RETURNED FLOW PROBE AND MOTOR AT THE SAME WORKING POINTS AS THEY WERE SEEN IN THE LOG FILE FOR TWO DAYS AND NO PROBLEM OR FAULT OCCURRED. THE RETURNED DEVICES OPERATED AS INTENDED THROUGHOUT THE INVESTIGATION AND THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE REPORTED NO FLOW ISSUE COULD NOT BE CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS REVEALED THAT THE DEVICE MET APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THE MANUFACTURER IS CLOSING THE FILE ON THIS EVENT.
THE PATIENT WAS PLACED ON BIVENTRICULAR EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT ON (B)(6) 2017. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2017, THE SYSTEM INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO FLOW, ALTHOUGH THE PUMP ROTOR WAS ROTATING. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD FLOW AND PRESSURE ON THE LEFT VENTRICULAR DEVICE THROUGHOUT THE EVENT, EVEN THOUGH THE PRIMARY CONSOLE DISPLAYED NO FLOW. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED DUE TO THE EVENT. THE FLOW PROBE, MOTOR, AND PRIMARY CONSOLE WERE EXCHANGED FOR BACKUP UNITS. THE PATIENT REMAINED ON BIVENTRICULAR SUPPORT AWAITING TRANSPLANT. ON 27SEP2017 DURING THE INVESTIGATION OF THE RETURNED EQUIPMENT, A SECOND PRIMARY CONSOLE WAS ALSO RETURNED AND WAS FOUND TO BE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE EVENT. THE SECOND PRIMARY CONSOLE WAS REPORTEDLY USED AS A BACKUP UNIT WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 753017 | THORATEC CENTRIMAG PRIMARY CONSOLE | CENTRIMAG PRIMARY CONSOLE | DWA | THORATEC SWITZERLAND GMBH |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 YR | Hospitalization| R |