UNKNOWN CODMAN EVD CATHETER
Report
- Report Number
- 1226348-2017-10357
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 30, 2017
- Date of Event
- March 1, 2006
- Product Code
- JXG
- PMA / PMN Number
- N/A
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CH
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
UDI: UNKNOWN PART NUMBER, UDI UNAVAILABLE. IT HAS BEEN COMMUNICATED THAT THE DEVICE AND/OR LOT INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. WITHOUT THE DEVICE AND/OR LOT INFORMATION IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR CODMAN TO CONDUCT A PROPER INVESTIGATION. IF AT SOME POINT THE DEVICE AND/OR LOT INFORMATION DOES BECOME AVAILABLE, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE RE-OPENED, EVALUATED AND A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE FILED. TRENDS WILL BE MONITORED FOR THIS AND SIMILAR COMPLAINTS. AT THE PRESENT TIME THIS COMPLAINT IS CONSIDERED CLOSED. DEVICE NOT AVAILABLE.
IN THE LITERATURE ARTICLE ¿CEFEPIME VS. AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM AND AZTREONAM AS ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN NEUROSURGICAL PATIENTS WITH EXTERNAL VENTRICULAR DRAIN: RESULT OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL¿ PUBLISHED JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS (2006) 31, 231¿235, IT WAS REPORTED THAT CSF INFECTIONS (14 IN GROUP A & 8 IN GROUP B) AND WOUND INFECTIONS (8 IN GROUP A AND 3 IN GROUP B) WERE REPORTED IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE USE OF THE CODMAN EVD CATHETERS. PER THE ARTICLE: ¿INTRODUCTION: WE AIMED TO FIND OUT WHETHER SINGLE BOARD SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS WAS AS GOOD AS DUAL SPECIFIC ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN NEUROSURGICAL PATIENTS WITH EXTERNAL VENTRICULAR DRAIN (EVD) IN SITU. METHOD: IN A 2-YEAR PERIOD, 255 ELIGIBLE PATIENTS WERE RECRUITED. PATIENTS WERE RANDOMIZED INTO TWO GROUPS OF ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS AS LONG AS THE VENTRICULAR CATHETER IN SITU. GROUP A EMPLOYED CEFEPIME 2G 12 HOURLY AND GROUP B EMPLOYED DUAL ANTIBIOTICS AS AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM 3 G 8 HOURLY AND AZTRENAM 2 G 8 HOURLY. RESULTS: THERE WAS NO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CEREBROSPINAL FLUID (CSF) INFECTION RATE WITH 14 PATIENTS IN GROUP A (CEFEPIME PROPHYLAXIS) AND EIGHT PATIENTS IN GROUP B (DUAL PROPHYLAXIS WITH AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM AND AZTRENAM) HAD CSF INFECTION. THERE WAS ALSO NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WOUND INFECTION RATE HAPPENED IN EIGHT PATIENTS IN GROUP A AND THREE PATIENTS IN GROUP B. THERE WAS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN EXTRACRANIAL INFECTION RATE BETWEEN BOTH GROUPS. CONCLUSION: SINGLE BOARD SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS WITH CEFEPIME WAS AN EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE REGIMEN FOR NEUROSURGICAL PATIENTS WITH AN EVD IN SITU.¿ AT THE TIME OF COMPLAINT ENTRY NO DEVICE SPECIFIC INFORMATION, I.E. CATALOGUE/LOT NUMBER, OR PATIENT SPECIFIC IDENTIFIERS IS AVAILABLE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 379330 | UNKNOWN CODMAN EVD CATHETER | SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS | JXG | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |