ANEURX
Report
- Report Number
- 2953200-2017-00626
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- April 18, 2017
- Date of Event
- August 1, 2010
- Report Date
- March 28, 2017
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR
- Product Code
- MIH
- PMA / PMN Number
- P990020
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NL
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4). A GOOD FAITH EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO OBTAIN THE APPLICABLE INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE REPORT. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
(B)(4) WAS CODED INCORRECTLY AND HAS BEEN REMOVED. A GOOD FAITH EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO OBTAIN THE APPLICABLE INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE REPORT. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
CORRECTED INFORMATION: SEX. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE JOURNAL ARTICLE ENTITLED: DEVICE-SPECIFIC OUTCOMES AFTER ENDOVASCULAR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM REPAIR. BASTOS GONCALVES F1, ROUWET ELLEN V, METZ R, HENDRIKS JM, VRANCKEN PEETERS M-, MUHS BE, VERHAGEN HJ. J CARDIOVASC SURG (TORINO). 2010 AUG;51(4):515-31. AN ANEURX, TALENT AND ENDURANT STENT GRAFT SYSTEMS WERE IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT FOR ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM AND RUPTURED AORTIC ANEURYSMS. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS IN THIS JOURNAL ARTICLE: (ANEURX) MIGRATION, TYPE I ENDOLEAK, POST-OPERATIVE RUPTURE, STENT FRACTURE, STENT SEVERANCE, CONNECTING BAR FRACTURE. (TALENT) MIGRATION, TYPE I ENDOLEAK, STENT FRACTURE, CONNECTING BAR FRACTURE, POST-OPERATIVE RUPTURE ANEURYSM, VESSEL OCCLUSION, STENT SEVERANCE, LIMB OCCLUSION. (ENDURANT) TYPE I ENDOLEAK, LIMB OCCLUSION, FEMORAL PSEUDO-ANEURYSM. ABSTRACT OVER THE LAST DECADE, ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR (EVAR) HAS BEEN USED EXTENSIVELY FOR THE ELECTIVE TREATMENT OF INFRA-RENAL ABDOMINAL ANEURYSMS. HOWEVER, IT REMAINS UNCLEAR HOW SPECIFIC DEVICES PERFORM AND HOW THEY COMPARE TO OTHERS. WE PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF CURRENTLY USED ENDOGRAFTS, AND DISCUSS THE CURRENT EVIDENCE REGARDING DEVICE-SPECIFIC OUTCOMES. PUBLISHED LITERATURE CONFIRMS DIFFERENCES IN RESULTS ACCORDING TO ENDOGRAFT SELECTION. THESE DIFFERENCES WERE MORE PRONOUNCED WITH OLDER GENERATIONS OF DEVICES, IN COMPARISON TO NEWER MODELS. CONTEMPORARY RESULTS ARE GENERALLY GOOD AND ONE SHOULD REMEMBER THAT NO RANDOMIZED DATA EXIST REGARDING INDIVIDUAL DEVICE PERFORMANCE. MOREOVER, BY THE TIME THERE IS ENOUGH FOLLOW-UP TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS, THE DATA IS RELATIVELY OBSOLETE DUE TO CONSTANT IMPROVEMENTS IN ENDOGRAFT TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN. RESULTS FROM EVAR HAVE BEEN STEADILY IMPROVING AND INDIVIDUALIZED DEVICE SELECTION HAS SHOWN TO BE VALUABLE. IT APPEARS THAT PATIENTS WITH FAVORABLE ANATOMY DO WELL WITH MOST MODERN ENDOGRAFTS. THOSE WITH CHALLENGING ANATOMIES MAY BENEFIT MORE FROM A PARTICULAR DESIGN, DELIVERY AND DEPLOYMENT FEATURE REQUIRING GREATER KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE FOR ADEQUATE DEVICE SELECTION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 282802 | ANEURX | SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT | MIH | MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |