STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Report
- Report Number
- 3007566237-2017-00307
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- January 26, 2017
- Date of Event
- March 1, 2016
- Report Date
- January 26, 2017
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
- Product Code
- MHY
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960009
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SP
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE MAIN COMPONENT OF THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED IN THE REPORTED EVENT; OTHER APPLICABLE COMPONENTS ARE: PRODUCT ID NEU_UNKNOWN_LEAD, LOT # UNKNOWN, PRODUCT TYPE LEAD.
RODRIGUEZ CRUZ, PM., VARGAS, A., FERNANDEZ-CARBALLAL, C., GARBIZU, J., DE LA CASA-FAGES, B., GRANDAS, F. LONG-TERM THALAMIC DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION FOR ESSENTIAL TREMOR: CLINICAL OUTCOME AND STIMULATION PARAMETERS. MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE. 2016;3(6):567-572. SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: THE REASONS UNDERLYING THE LOSS OF EFFICACY OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) OF THE THALAMIC NUCLEUS VENTRALIS INTERMEDIUS (VIM-DBS) OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL TREMOR ARE NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD. METHODS: LONG-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOME AND STIMULATION PARAMETERS WERE EVALUATED IN 14 PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL TREMOR WHO UNDERWENT VIM-DBS. THE MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP WAS 7.7±3.8 YEARS. AT EACH VISIT (EVERY 3¿6 MONTHS), TREMOR WAS ASSESSED USING THE FAHN-TOLOSA-MARIN TREMOR RATING SCALE (FTM-TRS) AND STIMULATION PARAMETERS WERE RECORDED (CONTACTS, VOLTAGE, FREQUENCY, PULSE WIDTH, AND TOTAL ELECTRICAL ENERGY DELIVERED BY THE INTERNAL GENERATOR [TEED1SEC]). RESULTS: THE MEAN REDUCTION IN FTM-TRS SCORE WAS 73.4% AT 6 MONTHS AFTER VIM-DBS SURGERY (P <(><<)> 0.001) AND 50.1% AT THE LAST VISIT (P <(><<)> 0.001). THE GRADUAL WORSENING OF FTM-TRS SCORES OVER TIME FIT A LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL (COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION [R2] = 0.887; P <(><<)> 0.001). STIMULATION ADJUSTMENTS TO OPTIMIZE TREMOR CONTROL REQUIRED A STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN VOLTAGE (P = 0.01), PULSE WIDTH (P = 0.01), FREQUENCY (P = 0.02), AND TEED1SEC (P = 0.008). TEED1SEC FIT A THIRD-ORDER POLYNOMIAL CURVE MODEL THROUGHOUT THE FOLLOWUP PERIOD (R2 = 0.966; P <(><<)> 0.001). THE INITIAL EXPONENTIAL INCREASE (FIRST 4 YEARS OF VIM-DBS) WAS FOLLOWED BY A PLATEAU AND A FURTHER INCREASE FROM THE SEVENTH YEAR ONWARD. CONCLUSIONS: THE CURRENT FINDINGS SUGGEST THAT THE WANING EFFECT OF VIM-DBS OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL TREMOR MAY BE THE CONSEQUENCE OF A COMBINATION OF FACTORS. SUPERIMPOSED ON THE PROGRESSION OF THE DISEASE, TOLERANCE CAN OCCUR DURING THE EARLY YEARS OF STIMULATION. REPORTED EVENT: 2 PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED VIM-DBS FOR ESSENTIAL TREMOR WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY BECAUSE THEY EXPERIENCED NO/POOR THERAPEUTIC BENEFIT AFTER INITIAL PROGRAMMING DUE TO ¿SUBOPTIMAL¿ PLACEMENT OF THE ELECTRODES. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN SPECIFIC DEVICE INFORMATION FROM THE ARTICLE OR TO MATCH THE REPORTED EVENT WITH ANY PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EVENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64142 | STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR | MHY | MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION | NEU_INS_STIMULATOR | UNKNOWN |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |