ARCTIC SUN GEL PAD
Report
- Report Number
- 1018233-2016-01769
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- December 8, 2016
- Date of Event
- August 15, 2016
- Report Date
- January 19, 2017
- Manufacturer
- PRODUCTOS PARA EL CUIDADO DE LA SALUD -9611590
- Product Code
- DWJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K142702
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- BIOMEDICAL ENGINEER
Narratives
THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL IN PROGRESS. ONCE THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETE A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY BARD REPRESENTS ALL OF THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT / REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BARD.
RECEIVED 1 USED UNIVERSAL PAD ONLY. THE REPORTED EVENT WAS UNCONFIRMED, AS THE PROBLEM COULD NOT BE REPRODUCED. THE VISUAL INSPECTION NOTED NO OBVIOUS DEFECTS THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED PROBLEM. THE PAD WAS REVIEWED AND USE EVIDENCE WAS NOTED. THE PAD 'S TRIM PATTERN WAS FOUND TO BE CORRECT. THE ENERGY CONNECTOR WAS FOUND FREE OF DAMAGES AND PRESENTED A GOOD CONNECTION. THE FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION WAS CONDUCTED AS FOLLOWS: THE PAD WAS SUBMITTED TO THE FLOW RATE TEST UNDER TEST METHOD TM7600515 WITH THE ARCTIC SUN MACHINE MODEL 2000 THE PAD WAS CONNECTED TO THE ARCTIC SUN MACHINE MODEL 2000 DURING 10 MINUTES, SEE DETAILS BELOW: * UNIVERSAL PAD: A TOTAL OF 5.15 L/MIN M2 OF FLOW RATE WERE REGISTERED DURING THE TEST. ACCORDING THE TEST METHOD TM7600515 THE FLOW RATE WAS FOUND TO BE ACCEPTABLE ON THE RETURNED PAD. THE FLOW RATE FOR THIS PRODUCT MUST BE ABOVE 2.4 L/MIN M2. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD WAS REVIEWED AND FOUND NOTHING THAT COULD HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE STATE THE FOLLOWING: ¿6. ONCE THE PADS ARE PRIMED, ASSURE THE FLOW RATE DISPLAYED ON THE CONTROL PANEL IS GREATER THAN 2.3 LITERS PER MINUTE, WHICH IS THE MINIMUM FLOW RATE FOR A FULLPAD KIT.¿ (B)(4): "L" (B)(4): "NL" THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY BARD REPRESENTS ALL OF THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT / REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BARD.
THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL IN PROGRESS. ONCE THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETE A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY BARD REPRESENTS ALL OF THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT / REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BARD.
THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL IN PROGRESS. ONCE THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETE A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY BARD REPRESENTS ALL OF THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT / REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BARD.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO SINGLE UNIVERSAL PADS, USED ON A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, HAD LOW FLOW. THE FIRST PAD HAD A FLOW OF ABOUT 0.5 LPM; AS A RESULT, THE PAD WAS SWAPPED WITH A NEW PAD . HOWEVER, THAT PAD ALSO HAD LOW FLOW. THE THERAPY WAS CONTINUED AND COMPLETED WITH THE TWO ALLEGED LOW FLOW PADS CONNECTED TO THE FLUID DELIVERY LINE. THE FLOW OF THE TWO PADS COMBINED WAS ABOUT 1.1 LPM.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO SINGLE UNIVERSAL PADS, USED ON A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, HAD LOW FLOW. THE FIRST PAD HAD A FLOW OF APPROXIMATELY 0.5 LPM; AND AS A RESULT, THE PAD WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW PAD . HOWEVER, THE REPLACEMENT PAD ALSO HAD LOW FLOW. THE THERAPY WAS CONTINUED AND COMPLETED WITH THE TWO PADS (THAT ALLEGEDLY PRODUCED LOW FLOW ), CONNECTED TO THE FLUID DELIVERY LINE. THE FLOW OF THE TWO PADS COMBINED WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.1 LPM.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO SINGLE UNIVERSAL PADS, USED ON A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, HAD LOW FLOW. THE FIRST PAD HAD A FLOW OF APPROXIMATELY 0.5 LPM; AND AS A RESULT, THE PAD WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW PAD . HOWEVER, THE REPLACEMENT PAD ALSO HAD LOW FLOW. THE THERAPY WAS CONTINUED AND COMPLETED WITH THE TWO PADS (THAT ALLEGEDLY PRODUCED LOW FLOW), CONNECTED TO THE FLUID DELIVERY LINE. THE FLOW OF THE TWO PADS COMBINED WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.1 LPM.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO SINGLE UNIVERSAL PADS, USED ON A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, HAD LOW FLOW. THE FIRST PAD HAD A FLOW OF APPROXIMATELY 0.5 LPM; AND AS A RESULT, THE PAD WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW PAD . HOWEVER, THE REPLACEMENT PAD ALSO HAD LOW FLOW. THE THERAPY WAS CONTINUED AND COMPLETED WITH THE TWO PADS (THAT ALLEGEDLY PRODUCED LOW FLOW ), CONNECTED TO THE FLUID DELIVERY LINE. THE FLOW OF THE TWO PADS COMBINED WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.1 LPM.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 806164 | ARCTIC SUN GEL PAD | ARCTIC SUN SUN GEL PAD UNIVERSAL | DWJ | PRODUCTOS PARA EL CUIDADO DE LA SALUD -9611590 | NGAN4034 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |