PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESOR
Report
- Report Number
- 8020030-2016-00079
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 27, 2016
- Date of Event
- October 31, 2016
- Report Date
- November 1, 2016
- Manufacturer
- LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PTY. LTD.
- Product Code
- IEO
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NZ
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
INVESTIGATION OF THIS COMPLAINT FOUND THAT THE CASSETTES LOADED INTO RETORT B BY A USER AT 17:08:58PM ON (B)(6) 2016 REMAINED IN THE DRY RETORT AT 65ºC UNTIL 09:37AM ON (B)(6) 2016 WHEN RETORT B WAS ACCESSED. THE TISSUE SAMPLES HAD REMAINED IN RETORT B AT 65ºC WITHOUT BEING COVERED BY REAGENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 65 HOURS. AT 17:08:50PM AND 17:08:52PM ON (B)(6), A USER ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: "INCOMPATIBLE REAGENT IN RETORT. CLEAN RETORT OR EDIT PROTOCOL, RETORT B." AT 17:10:16PM ON (B)(6) 2016, THE USER SELECTED <START>; AND THE <RUN VALIDATION CHECKS> DIALOG BOX WAS DISPLAYED TO THE USER. THE <RUN VALIDATION CHECKS> DIALOG BOX DISPLAYED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: "WAX RESIDUE IN RETORT B IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FORMALIN. CLEAN RETORT OR USE "EDIT STEPS" IN SCHEDULING DIALOG TO START PROTOCOL WITH A COMPATIBLE REAGENT." THE INSTRUMENT FUNCTIONED AS DESIGNED IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES INVOLVED BY PREVENTING THE USER FROM STARTING A PROTOCOL IN RETORT B; AND NOTIFYING THE USER THAT THE PROTOCOL COULD NOT BE STARTED BECAUSE RETORT B CONTAINED WAX RESIDUE, WHICH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FORMALIN. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE SUB-OPTIMAL TISSUE PROCESSING REPORTED BY THE COMPLAINANT WAS A USE ERROR, WHICH RESULTED IN UNPROCESSED TISSUE SAMPLES REMAINING IN A DRY RETORT AT 65ºC FOR APPROXIMATELY 65 HOURS. SPECIFICALLY, THE USER ACKNOWLEDGED THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED IN <RUN VALIDATION CHECKS> DIALOG BOX INDICATING THAT THE WAX RESIDUE PRESENT IN RETORT B WAS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FORMALIN; BUT THE USER DID NOT EITHER CLEAN THE RETORT OR USE "EDIT STEPS" IN THE SCHEDULING DIALOG TO START THE PROTOCOL WITH A COMPATIBLE REAGENT AS INSTRUCTED AND THE PROTOCOL BEING SCHEDULED DID NOT START.
LEICA BIOSYSTEMS RECEIVED A COMPLAINT REGARDING "DAMAGED" TISSUE SAMPLES. ON 02 NOVEMBER 2016, A LEICA BIOSYSTEMS REPRESENTATIVE WAS ADVISED THAT: "THE CLINICAL HEAD IS CURRENTLY MAKING HER ASSESSMENT ON THE CASES WHICH HAVE BEEN AFFECTED. AT THIS STAGE, ALL 70 CASSETTES HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED AND THEY ESTIMATE THAT ALL 10 PATIENTS WILL REQUIRE RE-BIOPSY." AN IDENTIFIER, AGE OR DATE OF BIRTH AND GENDER WAS REQUESTED FOR EACH AFFECTED PATIENT. FURTHER INFORMATION COMMUNICATED TO LEICA BIOSYSTEMS ON 02 NOVEMBER 2016 INDICATED THAT PATIENT DETAILS WOULD NOT BE PROVIDED. ON 16 NOVEMBER 2016, LEICA BIOSYSTEMS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT FROM THE CLINICAL HEAD HISTOPATHOLOGY: "THE OUTCOME OF OUR INVESTIGATION INTO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES IS THAT 3 PATIENTS HAVE REQUIRED REBIOPSY UNDER LOCAL ANESTHETIC TO REACH TISSUE DIAGNOSIS. NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION OR DEATH/SERIOUS INJURY HAS OCCURRED. THERE HAS ALSO BEEN NO IMPAIRMENT OF BODY FUNCTION OR PERMANENT DAMAGE TO A BODY STRUCTURE". INVESTIGATION OF THIS COMPLAINT BY LEICA BIOSYSTEMS IS IN PROGRESS. REFER TO MFR. REPORT# 8020030-2016-00078 AND #8020030-206-00080 FOR THE OTHER PATIENTS INVOLVED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 778857 | PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESOR | AUTOMATED TISSUE PROCESSOR | IEO | LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PTY. LTD. | PELORIS II |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |