F4 DIALYZER PRODUCTION ASSY.
Report
- Report Number
- 1713747-2016-00555
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- November 17, 2016
- Date of Event
- October 25, 2016
- Report Date
- January 6, 2017
- Manufacturer
- OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
- Product Code
- FJI
- PMA / PMN Number
- K874872
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- OR, US
- Reporter Occupation
- NURSE
Narratives
THE PLANT INVESTIGATION IS IN PROCESS. A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS ACTIVITY.
THE REPORTED COMPLAINT IS NOT CONFIRMED AS THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR MANUFACTURER EVALUATION, AND THE LOT NUMBER OF THE SUSPECT DEVICE WAS NOT PROVIDED. AS SUCH, A DEFINITIVE CONCLUSION REGARDING THE COMPLAINT INCIDENT CANNOT BE REACHED WITHOUT A PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE. A LOT HISTORY REVIEW WAS PERFORMED OF THE PRODUCTS SHIPPED TO THE DIALYSIS CENTER FOR THE THREE (3) MONTH TIME FRAME WHICH IMMEDIATELY PRECEDED THE EVENT OCCURRENCE DATE. NO INFORMATION WAS FOUND AND NO LOTS WERE IDENTIFIED DURING THIS REVIEW, WHICH SOUGHT TO IDENTIFY THE LOT NUMBERS FOR ALL FRESENIUS DIALYZERS SHIPPED TO THIS ACCOUNT WITHIN THE SELECTED TIME FRAME. A SECONDARY SEARCH WAS PERFORMED TO IDENTIFY THOSE DIALYZER PRODUCTS, MOST RECENTLY DELIVERED TO THE USER FACILITY, WITH THE NOTED CATALOG NUMBER (0500318E). NO FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, WHICH MET THE SEARCH CRITERIA, WERE FOUND TO HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO THIS ACCOUNT WITHIN THE LAST THREE YEARS. AS THE LOT NUMBER WAS NOT IDENTIFIED BY THE USER FACILITY AND SINCE NO LOT INFORMATION WAS IDENTIFIED DURING THE SHIP HISTORY, A MANUFACTURING REVIEW WAS NOT ABLE TO BE PERFORMED. THEREFORE, NO PRODUCTION RECORDS WERE ABLE TO BE REVIEWED FOR PRODUCT NON-ACCEPTANCE OR DEVIATION IN THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS AS IT RELATED TO THE COMPLAINT EVENT. THE HEMOFLOW F4 HOLLOW FIBER DIALYZER PRODUCTS INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) DOCUMENT NOTES THE FOLLOWING UNDER "ANTICOAGULATION" WITHIN THE GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION. "UNLESS MEDICALLY CONTRAINDICATED, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO ANTICOAGULATE THE EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUIT DURING HEMODIALYSIS. THE CHOICE OF ANTICOAGULANT, THE DOSE, AND METHOD OF ADMINISTRATION IS THE DECISION OF THE PHYSICIAN.¿ THE INSERT SHEET FURTHER DETAILS THE PRODUCT INDICATION NOTING ¿F3, F4 DIALYZERS ARE DESIGNED FOR SINGLE USE IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC HEMODIALYSIS.¿
A HEMODIALYSIS REGISTERED NURSE (HDRN) AT THE USER FACILITY REPORTED A BLOOD LOSS EVENT THAT OCCURRED DURING A PATIENT TREATMENT. THE HDRN STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SUSTAINED LOW EFFICIENCY DIALYSIS (SLED) WHEN THE HD MACHINE GENERATED AN ALARM. THE ALARM TYPE WAS NOT REPORTED. ACCORDING TO THE HDRN, THE SLED TREATMENT WAS BEING MONITORED BY AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (ICU) RN. THE ICU RN STATED THAT THE MACHINE ALARM OCCURRED WHILE THE PATIENT WAS BEING MOVED, AND THE BLOOD PUMP STOPPED AS DESIGNED. HOWEVER, THE ICU RN WAS NOT ABLE TO CONFIRM HOW LONG THE PUMP HAD BEEN STOPPED. AFTER RE-SETTING THE ALARM, THE DIALYZER APPEARED TO BE CLOTTED, SO THE TREATMENT WAS NOT ABLE TO BE RE-STARTED. THE PATIENT WAS RE-SETUP ON A NEW SYSTEM, AND THEN THE TREATMENT WAS CONTINUED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER ISSUES. THE PATIENT¿S ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS (EBL) WAS NOTED AS BEING APPROXIMATELY 150ML. IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE PATIENT WAS RECEIVING HEPARIN FOR SYSTEM PATENCY AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT. NO PATIENT ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE EXPERIENCED AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY.
A HEMODIALYSIS REGISTERED NURSE (HDRN) AT THE USER FACILITY REPORTED A BLOOD LOSS EVENT THAT OCCURRED DURING A PATIENT TREATMENT. THE HDRN STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SUSTAINED LOW EFFICIENCY DIALYSIS (SLED) WHEN THE HD MACHINE GENERATED AN ALARM. THE ALARM TYPE WAS NOT REPORTED. ACCORDING TO THE HDRN, THE SLED TREATMENT WAS BEING MONITORED BY AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (ICU) RN. THE ICU RN STATED THAT THE MACHINE ALARM OCCURRED WHILE THE PATIENT WAS BEING MOVED, AND THE BLOOD PUMP STOPPED AS DESIGNED. HOWEVER, THE ICU RN WAS NOT ABLE TO CONFIRM HOW LONG THE PUMP HAD BEEN STOPPED. AFTER RE-SETTING THE ALARM, THE DIALYZER APPEARED TO BE CLOTTED, SO THE TREATMENT WAS NOT ABLE TO BE RE-STARTED. THE PATIENT WAS RE-SETUP ON A NEW SYSTEM, AND THEN THE TREATMENT WAS CONTINUED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER ISSUES. THE PATIENT¿S ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS (EBL) WAS NOTED AS BEING APPROXIMATELY 150ML. IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE PATIENT WAS RECEIVING HEPARIN FOR SYSTEM PATENCY AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT. NO PATIENT ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE EXPERIENCED AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 759866 | F4 DIALYZER PRODUCTION ASSY. | DIALYZER, CAPILLARY, HOLLOW FIBER | FJI | OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |