UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET
Report
- Report Number
- 1820334-2016-00710
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 15, 2016
- Report Date
- May 10, 2016
- Manufacturer
- COOK INC
- Product Code
- FAD
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AU
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4). THE EVENT IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION.
(B)(4). INVESTIGATION/EVALUATION: DURING THE COURSE OF THE INVESTIGATION, A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HISTORY, INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), DOCUMENTATION, SPECIFICATIONS, AND TRENDS OF THE PRODUCT WAS CONDUCTED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED. THEREFORE, NO PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS COULD BE PERFORMED. HOWEVER, A DOCUMENT BASED INVESTIGATION EVALUATION WAS PERFORMED. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THE PRODUCT WAS NOT MADE TO SPECIFICATIONS. THE IFU CAUTIONS THAT THERE HAVE BEEN DOCUMENTED COMPLICATIONS WITH URETERAL STENT PLACEMENT. THE USE OF URETERAL STENTS SHOULD CONSIDER THE RISK-BENEFIT FACTORS AS APPLICABLE TO THE PATIENT. BASED UPON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. WE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR SIMILAR COMPLAINTS AND HAVE NOTIFIED THE APPROPRIATE INTERNAL PERSONNEL. PER THE RISK ASSESSMENT, NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED.
THIS REPORT IS RELATED TO MDR # 1820334-2016-00402 ORIGINALLY SENT ON 07 JUNE 2016, AND WAS CREATED TO CAPTURE THE EVENTS OF CASE 4 OUT OF THE 5 CASES INDICATED IN THE LITERATURE ATTACHED. CASE 1: MDR# 1820334-2016-00402, CASE 2: MDR# 1820334-2016-00708, CASE 3: MDR# 1820334-2016-00709, CASE 5: MDR# 1820334-2016-00711. AS STATED IN THE JOURNAL ARTICLE "KNOTTED PROXIMAL LOOP OF URETERIC STENTS: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND FIVE CASE REPORTS", NARIMAN AHMADI, MINH TRAN, MARTIN ELMS AND RAMOND K; JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 1-6 ( 2014): "A (B)(6) MALE PRESENTED FOR AN ELECTIVE ROUTINE CHANGE OF BILATERAL URETERIC STENTS FOR RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS SECONDARY TO TREATED LYMPHOMA. ALTHOUGH THE PATIENT WAS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, HE STILL PRODUCED AROUND TWO LITERS OF URINE PER DAY. INTRAOPERATIVE ATTEMPTS TO RE-WIRE THE RIGHT-SIDED STENT (7 FR DOUBLE J. MULTI-LENGTH STIFF, COOK UROLOGICAL INC, (B)(4)) WERE UNSUCCESSFUL ONCE AGAIN SECONDARY TO MILD ENCRUSTATION WITHIN THE STENT LUMEN N REMOVAL OF THE STENT BY GENTLE TRACTION, A TIGHT KNOT WAS FORMED AND THE STENT BECAME STUCK AT THE LEVEL OF THE SACRO-ILIAC JOINT. A RIGID URETEROSCOPE WAS INTRODUCED AND HOLMIUM LASER WAS USED TO LASER THE KNOT AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN CASES I AND 2. HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE NARROW CALIBER OF THE URETER, WE WERE UNABLE TO LASER THE KNOT ITSELF. THE REMAINING PROXIMAL KNOTTED STENT FRAGMENT WAS PUSHED BACK UP TOWARD THE KIDNEY AND SUBSEQUENT FLEXIBLE PYELOSCOPY WAS ATTEMPTED. UNFORTUNATELY THIS WAS ALSO UNSUCCESSFUL SECONDARY TO THE NARROW CALIBER OF THE URETER (MDR# 1820334-2016-00709). AS A RESULT, A NEW STENT WAS INSERTED (7 FR DOUBLE J, MULTI LENGTH STIFF, COOK UROLOGICAL INC, (B)(4)) AND THE PROXIMAL KNOTTED STENT FRAGMENT WAS LEFT IN SITU. THE STENT FRAGMENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY RETRIEVED PERCUTANEOUSLY AT A LATER DATE. THE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE CONTRALATERAL STENT (7 FR DOUBLE J, MULTI-LENGTH STIFF, COOK UROLOGICAL INC, (B)(4)) WAS ALSO ABANDONED WHEN PREOPERATIVE IMAGING NOTED AN ALREADY FORMED PROXIMAL KNOT. THE STENT WAS LEFT IN SITU AND CHANGED PERCUTANEOUSLY AT A LATER DATE. (MDR# 1820334-2016-00710)." NO COMPLICATIONS WERE OBSERVED POST-OPERATIVE HAVE BEEN REPORTED.
THIS REPORT IS RELATED TO MDR # 1820334-2016-00402 ORIGINALLY SENT ON 07 JUNE 2016, AND WAS CREATED TO CAPTURE THE EVENTS OF CASE 4 OUT OF THE 5 CASES INDICATED. CASE 1: MDR# 1820334-2016-00402; CASE 2: MDR# 1820334-2016-00708; CASE 3: MDR# 1820334-2016-00709; CASE 4: MDR# 1820334-2016-00710 (SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT); CASE 5: MDR# 1820334-2016-00711. AS STATED IN THE JOURNAL ARTICLE "KNOTTED PROXIMAL LOOP OF URETERIC STENTS: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND FIVE CASE REPORTS", NARIMAN AHMADI, MINH TRAN, MARTIN ELMS AND RAMOND K; JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 1-6 ( 2014): "A (B)(6) MALE PRESENTED FOR AN ELECTIVE ROUTINE CHANGE OF BILATERAL URETERIC STENTS FOR RETROPERITONEAL FIBRO SIS SECONDARY TO TREATED LYMPHOMA. ALTHOUGH THE PATIENT WAS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, HE STILL PRODUCED AROUND TWO LITERS OF URINE PER DAY. INTRAOPERATIVE ATTEMPTS TO RE-WIRE THE RIGHT-SIDED STENT (7 FR DOUBLE J. MULTI!ENGTH STIFF, (B)(4)) WERE UNSUCCESSFUL ONCE AGAIN SECONDARY TO MILD ENCRUSTATION WITHIN THE STENT LUMEN N REMOVAL OF THE STENT BY GENTLE TRACTION, A TIGHT KNOT WAS FORMED AND THE STENT BECAME STUCK AT THE LEVEL OF THE SACRO-ILIAC JOINT. A RIGID URETEROSCOPE WAS INTRODUCED AND HOLMIUM LASER WAS USED TO LASER THE KNOT AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN CASES I AND 2. HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE NARROW CALIBER OF THE URETER, WE WERE UNABLE TO LASER THE KNOT ITSELF. THE REMAINING PROXIMAL KNOTTED STENT FRAGMENT WAS PUSHED BACK UP TOWARD THE KIDNEY AND SUBSEQUENT FLEXIBLE PYELOSCOPY WAS ATTEMPTED. UNFORTUNATELY THIS WAS ALSO UNSUCCESSFUL SECONDARY TO THE NARROW CALIBER OF THE URETER (MDR# 1820334-2016-00709). AS A RESULT, A NEW STENT WAS INSERTED (7 FR DOUBLE J, MULTI LENGTH STIFF, (B)(4)) AND THE PROXIMAL KNOTTED STENT FRAGMENT WAS LEFT IN SITU. THE STENT FRAGMENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY RETRIEVED PERCUTANEOUSLY AT A LATER DATE. THE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE CONTRALATERAL STENT (7 FR DOUBLE J, MULTILENGTH STIFF, (B)(4)) WAS ALSO ABANDONED WHEN PREOPERATIVE IMAGING NOTED AN ALREADY FORMED PROXIMAL KNOT (FIGURE 5). THE STENT WAS LEFT IN SITU AND CHANGED PERCUTANEOUSLY AT A LATER DATE. (MDR# 1820334-2016-00710)." NO COMPLICATIONS WERE OBSERVED POST-OPERATIVE HAVE BEEN REPORTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451197 | UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET | FAD STENT, URETERAL | FAD | COOK INC | NA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71 YR | Other |