ACUSON
Report
- Report Number
- 3009498591-2016-00194
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 13, 2016
- Date of Event
- October 4, 2013
- Report Date
- July 26, 2016
- Manufacturer
- SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
- Product Code
- OBJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K140959
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- TX, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WHICH IS BEING RE-SUBMITTED PER FDA'S REQUEST AS THE ORIGINAL SUPPLEMENTAL MDR (MFR#3009498591-2016-00194) SUBMITTED IN 2016 DID NOT GO THROUGH CORRECTLY. THE TYPE OF REPORT SECTION G7 WAS MISKENLY MARKED AS "INITIAL", INSTEAD OF FOLLOW-UP#1. THIS MDR IS THE RESULT OF A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF COMPLAINTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTIFYING CONCOMITANT DEVICES. THE REPORTED EVENT DESCRIBES SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE PROCEDURE OR PATIENT SYMPTOMS DUE TO THEIR CONDITION. THIS PRODUCT IS CONSIDERED A CONCOMITANT DEVICE AND DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. CORRECTIONS MADE TO FOLLOWING SECTIONS: D9, G1, G3, G7, H3, H6, H10.
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO PROVIDE PATIENT INFORMATION (SEE SECTION A1,2,3,4), UPDATE THE OUTCOMES ATTRIBUTED TO ADVERSE EVENTS (SEE SECTION B2), PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION (SEE SECTION B5, B7), CORRECT THE COMMON DEVICE NAME AND DEVICE PROCODE (SEE SECTION D2), UPDATE THE INITIAL REPORTER INFORMATION (SEE SECTION E1), CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THE MANUFACTURER'S CITY (SEE SECTION G2), UPDATE THE REPORT SOURCE (SEE SECTION G3), PROVIDE THE PMA/510(K) INFORMATION (SEE SECTIONG5), PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PATIENT CODE (SEE SECTIONH6), AND TO PROVIDE THE EVALUATION RESULTS (SEE SECTION H10). THE DEVICE REFERENCED IN THIS REPORT WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. THE DEVICE WAS VISUALLY INSPECTED AND NO PHYSICAL DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED. AN ACOUSTIC TEST WAS PERFORMED AND THE DEVICE PASSED.
THIS IS A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WHICH IS BEING RE-SUBMITTED PER FDA'S REQUEST AS THE ORIGINAL SUPPLEMENTAL MDR (MFR#3009498591-2016-00194) SUBMITTED IN 2016 DID NOT GO THROUGH CORRECTLY.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REPORTING THAT THE PATIENT WAS IN THE HOSPITAL FOR A REPEAT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AFIB) ABLATION PROCEDURE. PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS GIVEN AN ANTICOAGULANT. THE PHYSICIAN ACHIEVED A DIFFICULT TRANSEPTAL ACCESS WITH TWO SEPARATE SHEATHS. WITH BOTH SHEATHS ACROSS, THE PHYSICIAN BEGAN MAPPING WITH A LASSO CATHETER ON THE UPPER LEFT VEIN AND WHICH AT THIS POINT, A SLIGHT DROP IN THE PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE WAS NOTED. THIS WAS ATTRIBUTED TO THE ANESTHESIA SO THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED TO BURN THE TISSUE ON THE UPPER LEFT VEIN. AT THIS POINT, THE PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE CONTINUED TO DROP. AN INTRACARDIAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (ICE) SHOWED PERICARDIAL EFFUSION. THE EFFUSION BECAME MODERATE BUT ECHO SHOWED SEVERE EFFUSION. A PERICARDIOCENTESIS AND SURGICAL PERICARDIAL WINDOW WERE PERFORMED TO ALLEVIATE THE BLEEDING. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED 800 CC'S OF FLUID FROM THE PERICARDIAL CAVITY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS REPORTEDLY ABANDONED FOR PATIENT SAFETY. THE PATIENT WAS IMMEDIATELY TRANSFERRED TO SURGERY FOR REPAIR. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT MADE A FULL RECOVERY AFTER AN EXTENDED HOSPITAL STAY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN THOUGHT THAT THE EVENT WAS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE TRANSEPTAL PUNCTURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
THIS MDR IS THE RESULT OF A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF COMPLAINTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTIFYING CONCOMITANT DEVICES. THE REPORTED EVENT DESCRIBES SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE PROCEDURE OR PATIENT SYMPTOMS DUE TO THEIR CONDITION. THIS PRODUCT IS CONSIDERED A CONCOMITANT DEVICE AND DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED EVENT.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE MAPPING THE LEFT ATRIUM THE PATIENT BECAME HYPOTENSIVE. THE HYPOTENSION WAS TREATED WITH MEDICATION AND ABLATION WAS STARTED. THE PATIENT BECAME HYPOTENSIVE AGAIN. ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY SHOWED A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION. THE PROCEDURE WAS STOPPED CATHETERS WERE WITHDRAWN AND ANTI-COAGULATION WAS REVERSED. A PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED AND MORE THAN 800 CC'S OF FLUID WAS REMOVED FROM THE PERICARDIAL SPACE. THE PATIENT WAS NOT STABLE AT THE TIME OF THE CALL AND WAS BEING TRANSFERRED TO SURGERY. BWI PRODUCTS IN USE WERE: CARTO 3 10248, STOCKERT ST-0852, COOLFLOW PUMP 03618, NAVISTAR D131804, LASSO CATHETER D134301, AND ACUNAV 10135936. (B)(6).
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 443113 | ACUSON | ULTRASOUND CATHETER | OBJ | SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. | ACUNAV 8F-90 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71 YR | Female | Hospitalization| L| O |