EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION KIT
Report
- Report Number
- 1036844-2016-00339
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 12, 2016
- Date of Event
- May 12, 2016
- Report Date
- June 23, 2016
- Manufacturer
- TELEFLEX MEDICAL
- Product Code
- CAZ
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
QN#(B)(4). THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION AT THIS TIME. THE MANUFACTURER WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR AND TREND RELATED EVENTS.
(B)(4). A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS NO LOT NUMBER WAS PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER. A REVIEW OF SALES HISTORY DATA WAS PERFORMED TO OBTAIN A LOT NUMBER. HOWEVER, NO RECORD COULD BE FOUND. THE IFU FOR THIS KIT, K-05502-100D; REV. 11, WAS REVIEWED AS A PART OF THIS COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION. THE IFU WARNS THE USER, "NEVER TUG OR QUICKLY PULL ON CATHETER DURING REMOVAL FROM PATIENT TO REDUCE RISK OF CATHETER BREAKAGE. DO NOT APPLY ADDITIONAL TENSION ON THE CATHETER IF CATHETER BEGINS TO STRETCH EXCESSIVELY. REPOSITION PATIENT TO OPEN THE VERTEBRAL INTERSPACES AND RE-ATTEMPT REMOVAL IF RESISTANCE IS ENCOUNTERED OR IF CATHETER STRETCHES EXCESSIVELY DURING REMOVAL. DURING EPIDURAL CATHETER REMOVAL, THE LITERATURE INDICATES A FORCE OF APPROXIMATELY 1/3 OF A POUND IS ALL THAT IS NECESSARY TO EXERT IF PATIENT IS PROPERLY POSITIONED IN THE RECOMMENDED LATERAL NEUTRAL POSITION." A CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME AS A POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND WITHOUT A SAMPLE. OTHER REMARKS: COMPLAINT VERIFICATION TESTING COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS NO SAMPLE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS WERE NOT REVIEWED AS NO LOT NUMBER WAS PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER AND NO SALES HISTORY RECORDS COULD BE FOUND. THEREFORE, THE POTENTIAL CAUSE OF THE CATHETER BREAKING COULD NOT BE DETERMINED BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND WITHOUT THE SAMPLE.
COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT WAS IN LABOR AND EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS INSERTED TO ASSIST WITH LABOR. AT THE NORMAL INTERVAL, DISCONTINUATION OF THE CATHETER WAS ATTEMPTED. THE REGISTERED NURSE MET RESISTANCE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DISCONTINUE THE CATHETER AND NOTIFIED THE REGIONAL ANESTHESIA PROVIDER ON CALL. HE ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER BUT MET RESISTANCE. HE THEN FLUSHED THE CATHETER AND AGAIN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE IT. AT THAT POINT, THE CATHETER BROKE. THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT'S L4-L5 REGION AS CONFIRMED BY X-RAY AND CT. LATER THAT DAY THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE OPERATING ROOM FOR REMOVAL OF THE RETAINED CATHETER. IT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED AS CONFIRMED BY X-RAY. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED TWO DAYS LATER FOLLOWING CONFIRMATION THAT PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT WAS WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS.
COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT WAS IN LABOR AND EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS INSERTED TO ASSIST WITH LABOR. AT THE NORMAL INTERVAL, DISCONTINUATION OF THE CATHETER WAS ATTEMPTED. THE REGISTERED NURSE MET RESISTANCE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DISCONTINUE THE CATHETER AND NOTIFIED THE REGIONAL ANESTHESIA PROVIDER ON CALL. HE ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER BUT MET RESISTANCE. HE THEN FLUSHED THE CATHETER AND AGAIN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE IT. AT THAT POINT, THE CATHETER BROKE. THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT'S L4-L5 REGION AS CONFIRMED BY X-RAY AND CT. LATER THAT DAY THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE OPERATING ROOM FOR REMOVAL OF THE RETAINED CATHETER. IT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED AS CONFIRMED BY X-RAY. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED TWO DAYS LATER FOLLOWING CONFIRMATION THAT PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT WAS WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 439948 | EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION KIT | ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT | CAZ | TELEFLEX MEDICAL |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |