FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

15G R.K. EPIDURAL NEEDLE (TW)

MDR report key: 5666071 · Received May 19, 2016

Report

Report Number
1316297-2016-00002
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
May 19, 2016
Date of Event
March 30, 2016
Report Date
April 6, 2016
Manufacturer
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
Product Code
MIA
PMA / PMN Number
K072005
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
FL, US
Reporter Occupation
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY TECHNICIAN/REPRESENTATIVE

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

EPIMED PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED THAT THE CATHETERS IN QUESTION WERE BECOMING DAMAGED (SKIVING) AS A RESULT OF THE IMPROPER HANDLING TECHNIQUES USED BY THE PHYSICIANS IN COMBINATION WITH A FAILURE TO FOLLOW EPIMED'S IFU. HOWEVER, THROUGH SUBSEQUENT INVESTIGATION, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE CORRESPONDING 15G R.K. EPIDURAL NEEDLE WAS MOST LIKELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SKIVING ISSUES WHICH OCCURRED AT THE REPORTING ACCOUNT. TO DATE, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN ISOLATED TO THIS ONE INDIVIDUAL REPORTING ACCOUNT. REGARDLESS, EPIMED HAS OPENED AN INTERNAL CORRECTIVE ACTION TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS ISSUE. IN ADDITION, ON APRIL 20, 2016, EPIMED INITIATED A RECALL OF THE 15G RK NEEDLE. ALL QUESTIONABLE DEVICES WERE SUCCESSFULLY RECALLED, OFFICIALLY CLOSING THE RECALL REPORT ON MAY 11, 2016. PRODUCT NAME RECALLED: 15G R.K. EPIDURAL NEEDLE, CATALOG #/ REF #: 100-1415, AFFECTED LOT NUMBERS: 12157181, 12157325, AND 12157445.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

PER EPIMED'S COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION, EPIMED BELIEVES THAT THE (3) CATHETERS IN QUESTION WERE DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE IMPROPER HANDLING TECHNIQUES BY THE PHYSICIANS IN COMBINATION WITH A FAILURE TO FOLLOW EPIMED'S IFU. EPIMED DETERMINED THROUGH CONVERSATIONS WITH THE ACCOUNT THAT THE RK INTRODUCER NEEDLE REMAINED IN SITU DURING INITIAL REMOVAL AND REPOSITIONING OF THE CATHETERS IN QUESTION CASUING THE CATHETERS TO SKIVE THEIR OUTER (FEP) COATING. EPIMED BELIEVES THAT IF THE WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BREVI-STF (B)(4) (SPRING GUIDE EPIDURAL CATHETER PRODUCTS, REV. 3) WERE FOLLOWED, IT MAY HAVE PREVENTED DAMAGE TO THE CATHETERS IN QUESTION. EPIMED CONSIDERS THIS INCIDENT ISOLATED TO THIS ACCOUNT AND WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FUTURE COMPLAINTS TO PREVENT ADVERSE TRENDING FROM OCCURING.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

THIS SUBMISSION IS A FOLLOW-UP REPORT.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

ON (B)(6) 2016, (B)(6), MATERIALS MANAGER FOR SURGERY CENTER OF (B)(6) REPORTED THAT THE ACCOUNT HAD SOME MORE PROBLEMS WITH THREE ADDITIONAL BREVI-STF CATHETERS (A-EP-085). THIS IS THE SECOND COMPLAINT FROM THIS ACCOUNT INVOLVING SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES. THE FIRST COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4), WAS INVESTIGATED EARLIER IN THE MONTH AND HAS SINCE BEEN CLOSED. TWO INCIDENTS OCCURRED, ONE ON (B)(6) 2016, WITH DR. (B)(6) AND ONE ON (B)(6) 2016, WITH DR. (B)(6). DURING BOTH INCIDENTS, THE CATHETERS BEING USED SKIVED DURING THE PROCEDURES.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
323145 15G R.K. EPIDURAL NEEDLE (TW) 15G R.K. EPIDURAL NEEDLE (TW) MIA EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. A-NE-001 12157181 AND 12157325

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1