IMPLANTABLE MINIATURE TELESCOPE
Report
- Report Number
- 3005347768-2016-00002
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 27, 2016
- Date of Event
- March 17, 2016
- Report Date
- April 19, 2016
- Manufacturer
- VISIONCARE OPHTHALMIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD
- Product Code
- NCJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- P050034
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AZ, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS RECEIVED FROM VISIONCARE'S SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER WHO WAS PRESENT AND OBSERVED THE SURGERY: IN REGARD TO THE DETAILS OF THE SURGERY, THE RHEXIS WAS A BIT ON THE SMALL SIZE. I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT SIZE BECAUSE IT IS DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE VIA THE MONITOR BUT I COULD CERTAINLY SEE THAT IS WAS SLIGHTLY SMALLER THAN WHAT I TYPICALLY SEE. DURING THE INITIAL ATTEMPT TO INSERT THE IMT,THE SURGEON ENCOUNTERED SOME DIFFICULTY GETTING THE LEADING HAPTIC INTO THE BAG. HE ABORTED THAT ATTEMPT AND PULED THE IMT BACK OUT. AFTER BRIEF PERIOD OF TIME, HE MADE A SECOND ATTEMPT AND IT WAS AT THIS TIME WHEN I RECOGNIZED THAT THE HAPTIC HAD BROKEN. THE HAPTIC WAS FULLY SEPARATED AND PARTIALLY EXTENDED OUT OF THE WOUND. THE IMT WAS REMOVED ALONG WITH THE HAPTIC, THE SECOND IMT WAS PREPARED AND EVENTUALLY WAS SUCCESSFULLY PLACED IN THE BAG. THERE WAS STILL SOME DIFFICULTY ENCOUNTERED WITH THIS SECOND IMT BECAUSE (I ASSUME) OF THE SMALLER RHEXIS. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO VISIONCARE TECHNOLOGIES AFTER EXPLANT. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED UNDER VIDEO MAGNIFICATION OF 132X AND IT WAS SEEN THAT THERE WERE INDICATIONS OF MICRO CRACKS ON THE BASE OF BOTH OF THE HAPTICS, THE BROKEN HAPTIC AND THE INTACT HAPTIC. THE OTHER TELESCOPE PARTS WERE NOT DAMAGED. A REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING RECORDS (DHR) FOR THE DEVICE DID NOT REVEAL ANY NON-CONFORMITIES. THE SHELF LIFE AND TRANSPORT STABILITY TESTING CARRIED OUT INCLUDED FORCE TEST, COMPRESSION FORCE AND DYNAMIC FATIGUE AND LOOP STRENGTH TESTING. REVIEW OF THE LABELING SHOWED THAT DIRECTIONS FOR THE CORRECT HANDLING OF DEVICE ARE PROVIDED IN THE PROFESSIONAL USE. A DEVICE ASSEMBLED WITH A CARRIER FROM THE SAME BATCH AS THE CARRIER ON THE EXPLANTED DEVICE WAS EXAMINED AND NO SIGNS OF MICRO CRACKS WERE SEEN. BASED ON THE ABOVE INVESTIGATION, IT SEEMS THAT THE HAPTIC BREAK WAS DUE TO EXCESSIVE COMPRESSION FORCE BEING APPLIED TO THE HAPTICS.
DURING THE INITIAL ATTEMPT TO INSERT THE IMT, THE SURGEOPN ENCOUNTERED SOME DIFFICULTY GETTING THE LEADING HAPTIC INTO THE BAG. HE ABORTED THE ATTEMPT AND PULLED THE IMT BACK OUT. SHORTLY THEREAFTER HE TRIED AGAIN TO INSERT THE IMT AND IT BECAME APPARENT THAT THE HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. THE HAPTIC WAS FULLY SEPARATED AND PARTIALLY EXTENDED OUT OF THE WOUND. THE IMT TOGETHER WITH THE HAPTIC WAS REMOVED. THE SECOND (BACKUP) IMT WAS PREPARED AND SUCCESSFULLY PLACED IN THE BAG.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 267231 | IMPLANTABLE MINIATURE TELESCOPE | IMPLANTABLE MINIATURE TELESCOPE | NCJ | VISIONCARE OPHTHALMIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD | WA 2.7X | 10642 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 YR | Required Intervention |