PMTA ACCU21 STANDARD APPLICATOR
Report
- Report Number
- 1319211-2016-00009
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- February 4, 2016
- Date of Event
- January 5, 2016
- Report Date
- January 5, 2016
- Manufacturer
- ANGIODYNAMICS.
- Product Code
- NEY
- PMA / PMN Number
- K122762
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA
- Reporter Occupation
- 1
Narratives
THE REPORTED DEFECTIVE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS INCIDENT IS CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS. THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION AND ANY FOLLOW UP INFORMATION WILL BE SENT VIA A FOLLOW UP MEDWATCH. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORDS WAS PERFORMED FOR THE REPORTED LOT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS RELATED TO THE REPORTED DEFECT OF THE COMPLAINT. THE REVIEW CONFIRMS THAT THE LOTS MET ALL MATERIAL, ASSEMBLY, AND PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS. COMPLAINT # (B)(4).
RETURNED FOR EVALUATION WAS ONE PMTA ACCU2I STANDARD APPLICATOR. A VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE NOTED THE TUBING WAS CUT (THE CARTRIDGE WAS NOT RETURNED) AND THE TIP WAS BENT APPROX. 10 DEGREES BUT STILL FULLY ATTACHED. FUNCTIONAL TESTING COULD NOT BE PERFORMED DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE. THE CUSTOMER'S REPORTED COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION OF THE TIP OF THE APPLICATOR BEING BENT IS CONFIRMED. ALTHOUGH THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION IS CONFIRMED, A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE EVENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED. A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR COULD HAVE BEEN HANDLING DAMAGE; I.E. LATERAL FORCES ON THE APPLICATOR TIP. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PATIENT MOVING DURING THE PROCEDURE WHILE THE APPLICATOR WAS IN PLACE COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED ISSUE. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, WHICH IS SUPPLIED TO WITH CATALOG NUMBER, CONTAINS A STATEMENT "ALWAYS ADVANCE THE APPLICATOR INTO THE TARGET TISSUE USING AXIAL FORCES ONLY. AVOID PLACING LATERAL FORCES ON THE APPLICATOR TIP DURING PLACEMENT OR REMOVAL" AND LATERAL FORCES ON THE APPLICATOR TIP SHOULD BE AVOIDED BOTH DURING INSERTION AND REMOVAL. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD RESULT IN DAMAGE TO THE MICROWAVE ARRAY, FAILURE OF THE APPLICATOR AND INJURY TO THE PATIENT." A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS WAS PERFORMED FOR THE REPORTED PACKAGING AND COMPONENT LOTS FOR ANY DEVIATIONS RELATED TO THE REPORTED DEFECT OF THE COMPLAINT. THE REVIEW CONFIRMS THAT THE LOTS MET ALL MATERIAL, ASSEMBLY, AND PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS. A REVIEW OF THE ANGIODYNAMICS COMPLAINT SYSTEM NOTED NO TRENDS FOR THIS COMPLAINT TYPE AND PRODUCT FAMILY. THIS TYPE OF COMPLAINT WILL CONTINUE TO BE MONITORED FOR TRENDS. (B)(4).
AS REPORTED, (B)(6) 2016, PATIENT OF UNKNOWN AGE AND GENDER PRESENTED FOR A MICROWAVE PROCEDURE OF THE LIVER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AFTER WITHDRAWAL, THE TREATING PHYSICIAN NOTED THE TIP OF THE APPLICATOR PROBE WAS BENT. THE TIP OF THE APPLICATOR HAD NOT DETACHED FROM THE SHAFT OF THE PROBE AND NO WIRES WERE EXPOSED. THE DEVICE WAS SET ASIDE AND A NEW OF THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO HARM OR INJURY DUE TO THE EVENT. THE REPORTED DISPOSABLE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68859 | PMTA ACCU21 STANDARD APPLICATOR | NEY | ANGIODYNAMICS. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |