MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 2-9MM
Report
- Report Number
- 3005985723-2015-00125
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 17, 2015
- Date of Event
- June 24, 2015
- Report Date
- June 24, 2015
- Manufacturer
- MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
- Product Code
- NPJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K090763
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- MA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
AN EVENT REGARDING ALLEGED SEATING ISSUES INVOLVING A MAKO INSERT WAS REPORTED. THE EVENT WAS NOT CONFIRMED. METHOD & RESULTS: DEVICE EVALUATION AND RESULTS: COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS NO ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT WERE RETURNED OR MADE AVAILABLE FOR IDENTIFICATION OR EVALUATION. MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED AND EVALUATION: NO PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS WERE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW. DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW: ALL DEVICES IN THE REPORTED LOT WERE MANUFACTURED AND ACCEPTED INTO FINAL STOCK WITH NO REPORTED DISCREPANCIES. COMPLAINT HISTORY REVIEW: A COMPLAINT HISTORY REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS NO LOT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. CONCLUSIONS: THE EVENT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED NOR THE ROOT CAUSE DETERMINED BECAUSE THE DEVICES WERE NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AND INSUFFICIENT MEDICAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. IF THE DEVICES AND/OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE RECEIVED, THIS INVESTIGATION WILL BE REOPENED AND RE-EVALUATED.
AN EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE CANNOT BE PERFORMED AS THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, BUT NOT MADE AVAILABLE. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOME AVAILABLE IT WILL BE REPORTED IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT UPON COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION. NOT RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER
DR. (B)(6) PERFORMED A (B)(4) MAKO SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2015. HE NOTICED THE NEXT DAY FROM THE X-RAY THAT IT APPEARED THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS NOT SEATED CORRECTLY. HE DECIDED HE WOULD PERFORM A POLY EXCHANGE ON (B)(6). HE OPENED WOUND, SAW THE INSERT WAS NOT LOCKED IN THE POSTERIOR. HE REMOVED THAT INSERT AND PUT ANOTHER IN. HE SAID HE THOUGHT IT LOOKED SEATED ORIGINALLY BUT DUE TO THE PATIENT'S SMALL ANATOMY HE WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE POSTERIOR WELL. HE TOOK EXTRA CARE TO MAKE SURE THE SECOND ONE WAS SEATED CORRECTLY AND WAS HAPPY WITH THE OUTCOME. HE SAID THE PATIENT WAS VERY UNDERSTANDING.
DR. (B)(6) PERFORMED A UKA MAKO SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2015. HE NOTICED THE NEXT DAY FROM THE X-RAY THAT IT APPEARED THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS NOT SEATED CORRECTLY. HE DECIDED HE WOULD PERFORM A POLY EXCHANGE ON (B)(6). HE OPENED WOUND, SAW THE INSERT WAS NOT LOCKED IN THE POSTERIOR. HE REMOVED THAT INSERT AND PUT ANOTHER IN. HE SAID HE THOUGHT IT LOOKED SEATED ORIGINALLY BUT DUE TO THE PATIENT'S SMALL ANATOMY HE WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE POSTERIOR WELL. HE TOOK EXTRA CARE TO MAKE SURE THE SECOND ONE WAS SEATED CORRECTLY AND WAS HAPPY WITH THE OUTCOME. HE SAID THE PATIENT WAS VERY UNDERSTANDING.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 465272 | MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 2-9MM | IMPLANT | NPJ | MAKO SURGICAL CORP. | 12021113-2 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51 YR | Required Intervention |