PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Report
- Report Number
- 2520274-2015-14434
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 16, 2015
- Date of Event
- March 15, 2008
- Report Date
- June 2, 2015
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
- Product Code
- MJO
- PMA / PMN Number
- PP050010
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SZ
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. THIS REPORT IS FOR UNKNOWN SUPERIOR ENDPLATE, UNKNOWN QUANTITY, UNKNOWN ITEM NUMBER AND UNKNOWN LOT NUMBER. UDI # UNKNOWN PART NUMBER, UDI IS UNAVAILABLE. (B)(6). (B)(4) FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION INTRAOPERATIVELY AND FUSION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO BREAKAGE IN LOWER PLATE. THE INVESTIGATION COULD NOT BE COMPLETED AND NO CONCLUSION COULD BE DRAWN, AS NO DEVICE WAS RETURNED AND NO LOT NUMBER OR PART NUMBER WAS PROVIDED. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE SUBSEQUENT REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE ARTICLE; WIRBELSÄULENCHIRURGIE, A (2008) ¿REVISION SURGERY AFTER IMPLANTATION OF A VERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS¿; ORTHOPADE. 2008 - 37:339-346. DOI 10.1007/S00132-008-1229-1 SPRINGER MEDIZIN VERLAG 2008 ((B)(6)). THIS ABSTRACT ARTICLE REPORTS ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE REVISABILITY OF SURGERY AFTER THE ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF VERTEBRAL DISCS SHOWS THAT THE SURGICAL APPROACH DEPENDS ON THE TIME OF REVISION SURGERY AND THE REASON WHY IT IS CARRIED OUT. EXPERIENCE IS BASED ON NINE REVISION OPERATIONS OUT OF 152 CERVICAL VERTEBRA PROSTHESES OF THE BRYAN AND PRODISC C TYPES IMPLANTED FROM 2003 TO 2007 AND 312 ENDOPROSTHESES OF THE CHARITÉ AND PRODISC TYPES IMPLANTED FROM 1999 TO 2007. RESULTS SHOW DIFFERING APPROACHES IN PERIOPERATIVE OR LATE POSTOPERATIVE REVISION OPERATIONS. OPERATIONS TO EXCHANGE IMPLANTS WERE NOT POSSIBLE, WHEREAS A CHANGE OF SURGICAL PROCEDURE IS THE RULE. THE SAME ACCESS ROUTE CAN USUALLY BE SELECTED IN THE CERVICAL SPINE, BUT IN THE LUMBAR SPINE THIS CAN ONLY BE DONE PERIOPERATIVELY; IF REVISION SURGERY IS CARRIED OUT AT A LATER DATE, AN ALTERNATIVE ACCESS ROUTE MUST BE USED. USING STRICT INDICATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY IMPLANT IS THE ONLY WAY TO PREVENT POSTOPERATIVE REVISION SURGERY THAT IS DUE TO AN INACCURATE PRIMARY ASSESSMENT AND NOT TO THE VERTEBRAL ENDOPROSTHESIS. THE NEXT GENERATION OF VERTEBRAL DISC ENDOPROSTHESES MUST INCORPORATE REDUCED LOAD OF THE ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINTS AND IMPROVED REVISABILITY COMPLICATIONS FROM THIS ARTICLE INCLUDE (9) REVISION OPERATIONS OUT OF 464 PATIENTS HAVING CERVICAL PROSTHESES FROM 1999 TO 2007, WITH COMPETITORS PRODUCT AND SYNTHES PRODISC C IMPLANTS. THIS REPORTED COMPLICATION IS FOR ONE UNKNOWN PATIENT WITH FUSION SURGERY THAT WAS PERFORMED IMMEDIATELY INTERPRETATIVELY ON PATIENT DUE TO BREAKAGE IN THE LOWER INFERIOR PLATE. THIS IS REPORT 10 OF 12 ITEMS FOR (B)(4). UDI # UNKNOWN PART NUMBER, UDI IS UNAVAILABLE. THIS UNKNOWN ITEM IF FOR A PRO DISC L IMPLANT, CONCOMITANT SUPERIOR ENDPLATE ITEM AND LOT NUMBER ARE UNKNOWN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 391031 | PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC | MJO | SYNTHES BRANDYWINE |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |