STENT CORONARY
Report
- Report Number
- 9616099-2015-00133
- Event Type
- Death
- Date Received
- March 25, 2015
- Report Date
- March 9, 2015
- Manufacturer
- CORDIS CORPORATION
- Product Code
- MAF
- PMA / PMN Number
- NA
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THIS IS THE INITIAL AND FINAL COMBINATION REPORT FOR THIS COMPLAINT. COMPLAINT CONCLUSION: THE "BEST FRIEND" OF AN UNSPECIFIED STENT BRAND PATIENT CALLED FOR MEDICAL INFORMATION AND ADDITIONALLY REPORTED ADVERSE EVENTS. PATIENT HAD AN UNSPECIFIED STENT (NOT SPECIFIED IF IT WAS A CORDIS PRODUCT) IMPLANTED IN AN UNSPECIFIED VESSEL FOR AN UNSPECIFIED REASON ON U/U/U, BEFORE (B)(6) 2006. PATIENT BEGAN PLAVIX THERAPY, UNSPECIFIED DOSING REGIMEN, ON U/U/U AND "WAS TOLD BY HER CARDIOLOGIST TO TAKE IT FOR ONLY 3 MONTHS, WHICH SHE DID". PLAVIX WAS DISCONTINUED ON U/U/U. ON U/U/U PATIENT EXPERIENCED "CLOTS" WHICH RESULTED IN DEATH AND REPORTER STATED "HE KILLED HER" REFERRING TO THE DOCTOR WHO HAD DISCONTINUED THE PLAVIX. NO FURTHER INFORMATION COULD BE OBTAINED AS REPORTER ABRUPTLY DISCONNECTED THE CALL. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AS IT REMAINS IMPLANTED. A REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING RECORDS COULD NOT BE CONDUCTED WITHOUT A LOT NUMBER. THROMBOSIS IS A KNOWN POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH STENT IMPLANTATION PROCEDURES AND IS LISTED IN THE IFU AS SUCH. THE ACT OF STENT IMPLANTATION PRODUCES INTENDED DAMAGE TO THE INTIMA OF THE VESSEL WALL IN ORDER TO REMODEL THE WALL AND REESTABLISH PATENCY OF THE VESSEL. THE DISRUPTION OF THE INTIMAL LAYERS TRIGGERS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM TO HEAL THE DAMAGED AREAS, THUS ACTIVATING THE CLOTTING MECHANISM AS WELL AS THE INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE. THE COMBINATION OF INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE AND CLOTTING CASCADE CAN LEAD TO THROMBUS FORMATION IN SIDE OF THE STENT AND INSTIGATE VESSEL REMODELING AROUND THE STENT, PRODUCING GAPS BETWEEN THE STENT AND THE VESSEL WALL. BASED ON THE LIMITED INFORMATION AVAILABLE, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DRAW A CONCLUSION ABOUT A CLINICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DEVICE AND THE EVENT. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF MANUFACTURING ISSUES THAT MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT; THEREFORE, NO CORRECTIVE ACTION IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.
THE "BEST FRIEND" OF AN UNSPECIFIED STENT BRAND PATIENT CALLED FOR MEDICAL INFORMATION AND ADDITIONALLY REPORTED ADVERSE EVENTS. PATIENT HAD AN UNSPECIFIED STENT (NOT SPECIFIED IF IT WAS A CORDIS PRODUCT) IMPLANTED IN AN UNSPECIFIED VESSEL FOR AN UNSPECIFIED REASON ON U/U/U, BEFORE (B)(6) 2006. PATIENT BEGAN PLAVIX THERAPY, UNSPECIFIED DOSING REGIMEN, ON U/U/U AND "WAS TOLD BY HER CARDIOLOGIST TO TAKE IT FOR ONLY 3 MONTHS, WHICH SHE DID". PLAVIX WAS DISCONTINUED ON U/U/U. ON U/U/U PATIENT EXPERIENCED "CLOTS" WHICH RESULTED IN DEATH AND REPORTER STATED "HE KILLED HER" REFERRING TO THE DOCTOR WHO HAD DISCONTINUED THE PLAVIX. NO FURTHER INFORMATION COULD BE OBTAINED AS REPORTER ABRUPTLY DISCONNECTED THE CALL.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201399 | STENT CORONARY | CORONARY SDS/STENTS | MAF | CORDIS CORPORATION | NA | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Death |