BAK/PROXIMITY
Report
- Report Number
- MW1027792
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- March 7, 2003
- Date of Event
- July 10, 1998
- Report Date
- February 25, 2003
- Manufacturer
- CENTERPULSE SPINE-TECH (SULZER-SPINETECH)
- Product Code
- MAX
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Voluntary report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PATIENT
Narratives
SURGERY IN 1998. L5-S1 POSTERIOR LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION AND BAK CAGE IMPLANTS. REPORTER HAS BEEN ADVISED BY SEVERAL DOCTORS THAT THE IMPLANTS WERE RECALLED. THE SURGERY WAS A FAILURE AS THE FUSION DID NOT WORK AND THE IMPLANTS HAVE NOW SHIFTED. REPORTER HAS BEEN IN CHRONIC PAIN EVER SINCE. REPORTER WAS NOT ADVISED OF THE RECALL FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR THE NEURO-SURGEON THAT PERFORMED THE SURGERY. RPTR WAS TOLD BY ANOTHER DR. IN JULY 2002 THAT IMPLANTS WERE RECALLED.
ADD'L INFO RECEIVED FROM MFR 5/29/03: THE NUMBER REFERENCED BY THE MEDWATCH REPORT IS IDENTIFIABLE AS A SPINE-TECH PART NUMBER. A MEDWATCH MFR'S REPORT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR THIS INCIDENT. A REVIEW OF CO'S COMPLAINT HISTORY, AND INCIDENT/EVENT RECORDS, DO NOT REFLECT HAVING PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED A RECORD OF THIS INCIDENT. THIS EVENT IS CURRENTLY RECORDED AS SPINE-TECH COMPLAINT FILE #2941 HAVING BEEN RECEIVED ON 16-APR-2003. SPINE-TECH HAS BEEN UNABLE, TO DATE, TO CONTACT REPORTER AT THE CONTACT NUMBER CONTAINED WITHIN THE MEDWATCH REPORT. THE CLAIMS WITHIN THE MEDWATCH REPORT REGARDING A RECALL OF THE DEVICE ARE UNFOUNDED. A REVIEW OF CO'S RECORDS INDICATES THAT THIS DEVICE HAS NEVER BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A RECALL. ADDITIONALLY, THE MEDWATCH REPORTED THAT THE "FUSION DID NOT WORK". WHILE A PT'S FAILURE TO ACHIEVE FUSION FOLLOWING IMPLANT SURGERY IS UNFORTUNATE, IT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF A FAILURE OF THE MEDICAL DEVICE ITSELF. WITHOUT ADD'L INFO RELATED TO THE CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE PT'S CONDITION, SURGEON NOTES, PRODUCT LOT NUMBERS, CLINICAL CONDITIONS, ETC., SPINE-TECH IS UNABLE TO INVESTIGATE THIS EVENT FURTHER. THE COMPLAINT FILE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MEDWATCH WILL BE CLOSED. SPINE-TECH STANDARD PROCEDURES WOULD DICTATE THE NECESSITY OF REOPENING COMPLAINT FILES IN THE EVENT THAT ADD'L OR SUPPLEMENTAL INFO IS FORWARDED AT A LATER DATE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BAK/PROXIMITY | INTERBODY DEVICE | MAX | CENTERPULSE SPINE-TECH (SULZER-SPINETECH) | 13 X 20MM | * | |
| 2 | SPINETECH INTRABODY IMPLANTS | BACK CAGE IMPLANTS | MAX | CENTERPULSE SPINETECH (SULZER-SPINETECH) | * | * |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 YR | Other| R| S |