ADVIA CENTAUR INTACT PTH (IPTH) ASSAY
Report
- Report Number
- 1219913-2014-00295
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- December 19, 2014
- Date of Event
- September 4, 2014
- Report Date
- November 14, 2016
- Manufacturer
- SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
- Product Code
- CEW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K121981
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
ON 11/02/2016 CORRECTION:THE 510K NUMBER REPORTED IN THE INITAL MDR WAS INCORRECT. THE CORRECT 510K NUMBER IS K133601.
THE CAUSE FOR THE DISCORDANT IPTH RESULTS WITH THE ALTERNATE METHOD IS UNKNOWN. INCONSISTENCIES IN PATIENTS RESULTS MAY BE DUE TO THE DIFFERENCES IN THE STANDARDISATION AND THE REFERENCE MATERIAL USED TO STANDARDIZE THE ASSAY METHODS. VARIABILITY MAY ALSO BE DRIVEN TO THE SPECIFICITY OF THE ANTIBODY USED AND THE DETECTION OF THE VARIOUS N TERMINAL PTH FRAGMENTS. AS THIS PATIENT IS A RENAL DIALYSIS PATIENT, THE PROBABILITY OF INTACT PARATHYROID FRAGMENTS BEING PRODUCED AND POTENTIALLY CAUSING VARIABILITY IN THE PATIENT RESULTS CAN NOT BE RULED OUT. THE INSTRUMENT IS PERFORMING WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS. NO FURTHER EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE IS REQUIRED. THE IFU STATES UNDER THE LIMITATIONS SECTION: "RESULTS SHOULD ALWAYS BE INTERPRETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PATIENT'S MEDICAL HISTORY, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, AND OTHER FINDINGS. INTERPRETATION OF INTACT PTH VALUES SHOULD ALWAYS TAKE INTO ACCOUNT SERUM CALCIUM RESULTS AND THE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THESE TWO ELEMENTS IN VARIOUS DISORDERS INVOLVING PTH AND CALCIUM. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE INTACT PTH RESULTS SHOULD ALWAYS BE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION AND WITH CONSIDERATION OF THE OVERALL CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS EVEN WHEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH CALCIUM VALUES. MEASUREMENT OF INTACT PTH IS USEFUL IN DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN HYPERCALCEMIA DUE TO HYPERPARATHYROIDISM AND HYPERCALCEMIA OF MALIGNANCY. HOWEVER, THE ASSAY IS NOT INTENDED AS, AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AS, A DIAGNOSTIC INDICATOR OF MALIGNANCY."
FALSELY HIGH ADVIA CENTAUR IPTH RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FOR SAMPLES FROM THE SAME PATIENT OVER A PERIOD OF THREE MONTHS. THE PATIENT SAMPLES WERE TESTED ON AN ALTERNATE METHOD AND THE RESULTS WERE LOWER. THE HIGH RESULTS WERE QUESTIONED BY THE PHYSICIAN. THE PATIENT'S THYROID WAS REMOVED AND TRANSPLANTED INTO THE UPPER ARM ABOUT A YEAR AGO. THE PATIENT IS ON DIALYSIS FOR RENAL FAILURE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF PATIENT TREATMENT WAS ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT IPTH RESULTS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 838773 | ADVIA CENTAUR INTACT PTH (IPTH) ASSAY | IPTH IMMUNOASSAY | CEW | SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. | N/A | 340 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |