FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY PERFORMED

MDR report key: 4329520 · Received December 15, 2014

Report

Report Number
2520274-2014-15296
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
December 15, 2014
Report Date
December 1, 2014
Manufacturer
SYNTHES USA
Product Code
GWO
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
PA, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

THIS DEVICE IS USED FOR TREATMENT NOT DIAGNOSIS. COMPARISON OF POLYETHERETHERKETONE AND TITANIUM CRANIOPLASTY AFTER DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY THIEN A, NICOLAS K., ANG K., WANG E, NG I. WORLD NEUROSURGERY. THIS REPORT IS OF AN UNKNOWN PEEK IMPLANT/UNKNOWN QUANTITY/ UNKNOWN LOT. INVESTIGATION COULD NOT BE COMPLETED AND NO CONCLUSION COULD BE DRAWN AS NO DEVICE WAS RETURNED AND NO LOT NUMBER OR PART NUMBER WAS PROVIDED. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE SUBSEQUENT REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE ARTICLE COMPARISON OF POLYETHERETHERKETONE AND TITANIUM CRANIOPLASTY AFTER DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY THIEN A, NICOLAS K., ANG K., WANG E, NG I. WORLD NEUROSURGERY. THE OBJECT OF THE STUDY WAS TO CHARACTERIZE COMPLICATION AND FAILURE RATES AND OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT CRANIOPLASTY WITH POLYETHERETHERKETONE (PEEK) AND TITANIUM IMPLANTS AND TO COMPARE COMPLICATION AND FAILURE RATES BETWEEN THE 2 IMPLANTS. A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT CRANIOPLASTY WITH PEEK PATIENT SPECIFIC IMPLANT (PEEK OPTIMA-LT; SYNTHES, INC, (B)(4), USA). COMPLICATIONS NOTED IN THE PEEK GROUP WERE ONE PATIENT WITH DEEP INFECTION, ONE PATIENT WITH EXPOSED IMPLANT, TWO PATIENTS WITH SEIZURES, ONE PATIENT WITH EXTRADURAL HEMORRHAGE AND THREE IMPLANT FAILURES WITH REVISIONS. CONCLUSION: THE FINDINGS FROM THIS STUDY HIGHLIGHT THAT CRANIOPLASTY IS ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNIFICANT COMPLICATIONS, INCLUDING THE NECESSITY FOR REOPERATION. IT IS HOPED THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS STUDY WILL PROVIDE BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PEEK AND TITANIUM CRANIOPLASTY AND CONTRIBUTE TO DECISION MAKING BY THE CLINICIAN AND PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS TWO OF TWO FOR (B)(4). THIS IS FOR ONE UNKNOWN PEEK IMPLANT.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
821303 PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY PERFORMED GWO SYNTHES USA

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Required Intervention