PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Report
- Report Number
- 2029214-2014-00648
- Event Type
- Death
- Date Received
- November 14, 2014
- Report Date
- October 15, 2014
- Manufacturer
- COVIDIEN
- Product Code
- OUT
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- GM
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THE DEVICES INVOLVED IN THE EVENT WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AS THEY WERE IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT.THE OTHER DEVICES INVOLVED IN THE EVENT ARE AS FOLLOWS:MODEL#: NOT REPORTED / LOT#: NOT REPORTED / DOM: N/A / EXP: N/A (QTY.4). (B)(4)
INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE ARTICLE, FISCHER S, PEREZ MA, KURRE W, ET AL. PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE FOR THE TREATMENT OF INTRA- AND EXTRACRANIAL FUSIFORM AND DISSECTING ANEURYSMS: INITIAL EXPERIENCE AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP. NEUROSURGERY. 2014 OCT; 75(4):364-374. A TOTAL OF 65 PATIENTS (41 FEMALES AND 31 MALES) WITH 69 FUSIFORM OR DISSECTING ANEURYSMS (38 LOCATED IN THE POSTERIOR CIRCULATION AND 31 LOCATED IN THE ANTERIOR CIRCULATION) UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR PED (PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE) TREATMENT. SIX CASES EXPERIENCED PED DEPLOYMENT DIFFICULTY. CASE# 2: TREATMENT OF A BA (BASILAR ARTERY) ANEURYSM. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH MASS EFFECT AND THE MRS (MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE) = 3. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PED TREATMENT INVOLVING 5 PIPELINES. POST PROCEDURAL CT (COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY) REVEALED A 2MM GAP BETWEEN THE PIPELINES. THE PATIENT REFUSED FURTHER TREATMENT AND SUBSEQUENTLY EXPIRED. THE REASON WAS UNKNOWN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 738096 | PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE | FLOW DIVERSION | OUT | COVIDIEN | NOT REPORTED | NOT REPORTED |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88 YR | Death |