EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Report
- Report Number
- 2015691-2014-02565
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 29, 2014
- Date of Event
- October 7, 2014
- Report Date
- October 7, 2014
- Manufacturer
- EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
- Product Code
- NPT
- PMA / PMN Number
- P130009
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- UK
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, DEVICE MALPOSITION REQUIRING INTERVENTION IS A KNOWN POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR) PROCEDURE. THERE ARE MULTIPLE PATIENT AND PROCEDURAL FACTORS THAT ALONE OR IN COMBINATION CAN CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO AORTIC MALPOSITION, INCLUDING IMPROPER POSITIONING PRIOR TO DEPLOYMENT, POOR IMAGE INTENSIFIER ANGLE, POOR COAXIAL ALIGNMENT OF THE VALVE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM, SEVERE SEPTAL HYPERTROPHY, MINIMALLY OR SEVERELY CALCIFIED AORTIC LEAFLETS, PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION, SIGNIFICANT MITRAL ANNULAR CALCIFICATION (MAC), LOSS OF PACING CAPTURE, AND MOVEMENT OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM BY THE OPERATOR. DEPLOYMENT OF THE SAPIEN VALVE TOO AORTIC HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUBOPTIMAL COAPTATION OF THE SAPIEN VALVE LEAFLETS AND CAUSE CENTRAL AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY; IT CAN OBSTRUCT THE CORONARY OSTIA; AND LEAD TO EMBOLIZATION OF THE PROSTHESIS INTO THE ASCENDING AORTA. THE THV TRAINING MANUALS INSTRUCT THE OPERATOR ON PROPER POSITIONING AND DEPLOYMENT OF THE VALVE, INCLUDING ALL PROCEDURAL AND ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS. PHYSICIANS ARE EXTENSIVELY TRAINED BY EDWARDS BEFORE THEY ARE QUALIFIED TO USE THE SAPIEN THV. TRAINING INCLUDES PATIENT SCREENING, DEVICE PREPARATION, APPROACH, DEPLOYMENT, IMAGING, PROCEDURE-SPECIFIC TRAINING MANUALS AND PROCTORED PROCEDURES. THE CORRECT ALIGNMENT AND POSITIONING OF THE DEVICE AT THE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT IS EMPHASIZED AS A KEY FACTOR TO THE PLACEMENT AND FIXATION OF THE DEVICE. OPERATORS ARE ALSO INSTRUCTED TO USE FLUOROSCOPY AS THE PRIMARY METHOD OF VISUALIZATION FOR POSITIONING AND DEPLOYMENT. IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK ANATOMICAL FEATURES FOR AORTIC MALPOSITION (I.E. MINIMAL LEAFLET CALCIFICATION, SEVERE SEPTAL HYPERTROPHY), BAV MAY PROVIDE INDICATION OF POTENTIAL BALLOON MOVEMENT DURING VALVE DEPLOYMENT IN THIS CASE, PROCEDURAL FACTORS (LOSS OF PACING DURING DEPLOYMENT) LIKELY CONTRIBUTED TO THE VALVE MALPOSITION. A SECOND VALVE WAS DEPLOYED, STABILIZING THE INITIAL VALVE. THE IFU AND TRAINING MANUALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO INADEQUACIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH REGARDS TO WARNINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, AND THE DIRECTIONS/CONDITIONS FOR THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF THE DEVICE. COMPLAINT HISTORIES FOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS ARE REVIEWED AGAINST TRENDING CONTROL LIMITS ON A MONTHLY BASIS, AND ANY EXCURSIONS ABOVE THE CONTROL LIMITS ARE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED AS PART OF THIS MONTHLY REVIEW. NO CORRECTIVE OR PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.
AS REPORTED BY OUR EUROPEAN AFFILIATE, DURING THE TRANSFEMORAL TAVR PROCEDURE, A 20MM SAPIEN XT VALVE WAS POSITIONED 50:50 AORTIC/VENTRICULAR, BUT DEPLOYED TOO AORTIC DUE TO PACING LOSING OF TWO BEATS DURING DEPLOYMENT. NO PARAVALVULAR LEAK (PVL) OR CENTRAL AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY (CAI) WAS NOTED. THE VALVE DEPLOYMENT WAS IN LINE WITH THE RIGHT CORONARY OSTIA, BUT DID NOT OBSTRUCT IT. DUE TO CONCERN OF THE INITIAL VALVE EMBOLIZING, A SECOND VALVE WAS POSITIONED AND DEPLOYED LOWER IN THE INITIAL VALVE TO STABILIZE IT. FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED IN STABLE CONDITION. IT WAS PERCEIVED THAT THE LOSS OF PACING DURING VALVE DEPLOYMENT CONTRIBUTED TO THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT¿S ANNULUS MEASURED 19.6MM WITH MODERATE NATIVE VALVE CALCIFICATION REPORTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 691832 | EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE | AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED | NPT | EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES | 9300TFX20 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84 YR | Required Intervention |