EXTERNAL NEUROSTIMULATOR, UNKNOWN
Report
- Report Number
- 3007566237-2014-03106
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 24, 2014
- Report Date
- October 3, 2014
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
- Product Code
- LGW
- PMA / PMN Number
- P840001
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- BE
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN SPECIFIC DEVICE INFORMATION FROM THE ARTICLE OR TO MATCH THE EVENTS REPORTED WITH PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EVENTS. CORRESPONDENCE HAS BEEN SENT TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE INQUIRING ABOUT PATIENT INFORMATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE REPORTED EVENTS. THIS DEVICE WAS USED OFF LABEL AS IT WAS USED FOR SUBDURAL MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION, NOT SPINAL CORD STIMULATION. PRODUCT ID 3998, LOT# UNKNOWN; PRODUCT TYPE LEAD PRODUCT ID NEU_UNKNOWN_EXT, LOT# UNKNOWN; PRODUCT TYPE EXTENSION. (B)(4).
DELAVALLEE, M., FINET, P., DE TOURTCHANINOFF, M., RAFTOPOULOS, C. SUBDURAL MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION: FEASIBILITY, EFFICACY AND SECURITY ON A SERIES OF 18 CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH A FOLLOW-UP OF AT LEAST 3 YEARS. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/S00701-014-2240-4. SUMMARY: MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION (MCS) IS CONSIDERED TO BE AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT IN SOME TYPES OF CHRONIC REFRACTORY NEUROPATHIC PAIN. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY IS TO EVALUATE AND CONFIRM THE FEASIBILITY, EFFICACY AND SECURITY OF OUR SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR SUBDURAL MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION (SDMCS) ON 18 CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH FOLLOW-UP OF AT LEAST 3 YEARS. OUR POPULATION CONSISTS OF 18 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS (12 MALE) BETWEEN 2000 AND 2010, WITH A MEAN AGE OF 63 YEARS (11¿91). THE MEAN FOLLOW-UP WAS 86 MONTHS (20¿140 MONTHS). WE IDENTIFIED THE CENTRAL SULCUS BY USING CLASSICAL ANATOMIC LANDMARKS AND NEURONAVIGATION (BRAINLAB SYSTEM; BRAINLAB, INC., REDWOOD CITY, CA). AN ELONGATED CRANIOTOMY (3 CM IN LENGTH, 1 CM IN WIDTH) WAS PERFORMED FOLLOWED BY LINEAR OPENING OF THE DURA MATER. AN EIGHT-POLAR PLATE ELECTRODE (SPECIFY LEAD, 3998; MEDTRONIC, MINNEAPOLIS,MN) WAS THEN SLIPPED SMOOTHLY THROUGH THIS LINEAR OPENING. IN PATIENTS WITH INTERHEMISPHERIC ELECTRODES (PATIENTS 2 AND 17), WE PERFORMED A PARASAGITTAL CRANIOTOMY OF 4 CM LENGTH AND 2 CM WIDTH. AT LAST FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT, 14 PATIENTS HAD A FAVOURABLE OUTCOME (77.7 %): 10 PATIENTS WITH EXCELLENT RELIEF OF PAIN (>80 %), 1 WITH GOOD RELIEF OF PAIN (60¿80 %) AND 3 WITH SATISFACTORY RELIEF OF PAIN (50¿60 %). FOUR PATIENTS SHOWED BAD RESULTS (<(><<)>50 %). WE DID NOT OBSERVE ANY LATE COMPLICATIONS SPECIFIC TO SD MCS. WE REPORT AN EFFICACY AT LEAST AS GOOD AS ED MCS, WITH NO COMPLICATIONS SPECIFIC TO SD MCS, EVEN WITH PROLONGED FOLLOW-UP. THE DATA ARE INSUFFICIENT TO ACTUALLY PROVE A LOWER ENERGY USE IN SD MCS. REPORTED EVENT: ONE (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT PRESENTED PARTIAL SEIZURES DURING THE EXTERNAL STIMULATION PERIOD. THE SOURCE LITERATURE INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING DEVICE SPECIFICS: SPECIFY LEAD MODEL 3998 FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED; A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. SEE ATTACHED LITERATURE ARTICLE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 678524 | EXTERNAL NEUROSTIMULATOR, UNKNOWN | STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF | LGW | MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION | NEU_ENS_STIMULATOR | UNKNOWN |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 00041 YR | Other |