FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Report
- Report Number
- 2025587-2014-00764
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 15, 2014
- Date of Event
- November 4, 1999
- Report Date
- October 28, 2014
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
- Product Code
- LWR
- PMA / PMN Number
- P970031
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NC, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE ARTICLE¿S CORRESPONDING AUTHOR WAS CONTACTED FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS REGARDING THE DEVICE AND PATIENT; NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED TO DATE. WITHOUT IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FOR THE DEVICE, MEDTRONIC¿S COMPLAINT DATABASE COULD NOT BE SEARCHED TO DETERMINE IF THIS HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED. THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION INDICATES THAT THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN EXPLANTED. THE EVENT DATE ON THIS REPORT IS BASED ON THE PRESENTATION OF THE ARTICLE'S FINDINGS AT A PROFESSIONAL CONFERENCE. A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED WHEN THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED. (B)(4). STENTLESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH FREESTYLE OR TORONTO SPV: AN EARLY COMPARISON AUTHORS: ROBERT D. RILEY, MD; JOHN W. HAMMON, JR., MD; SANDY M. ADAIR, RN; A. ROBERT CORDELL, MD; AND NEAL D. KON, MD ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY ANN THORAC SURG 2000;70:48¿52 DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01559-9 PRESENTED AT THE FORTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN THORACIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, NOV 4¿6, 1999. PUBLISHED ONLINE JULY 17, 2000.
TO DATE, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE ARTICLE'S AUTHOR CONTACT. BASED ON THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE, THERE WAS NO INFORMATION AS TO WHICH DEVICES WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ADVERSE EVENTS. A DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED, AS THE DEVICE SERIAL NUMBERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. BASED ON THE LIMITED INFORMATION RECEIVED, A ROOT CAUSE CANNOT BE DETERMINED.
IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM A JOURNAL ARTICLE THAT A PATIENT WITH AN IMPLANTED MODEL OF THIS AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS EXPERIENCED A POST-OPERATIVE THROMBOEMBOLIC COMPLICATION THAT MANIFESTED AS EITHER A TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK/CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT. NO SUBSEQUENT ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THE ARTICLE NOTED THAT THERE WERE NO PERIOPERATIVE DEATHS RELATED TO THIS DEVICE FAMILY AND PATIENT POPULATION. NO VALVES IN EITHER MANUFACTURER¿S DEVICE POPULATION REQUIRED REOPERATION FOR ANY STRUCTURAL OR NONSTRUCTURAL DEGENERATION DURING THE STUDY PERIOD. THE ARTICLE REVIEWED OUTCOMES WITH THIS MODEL AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S DEVICE FROM A TWO-YEAR PERIOD OF IMPLANTS FROM A SINGLE MEDICAL FACILITY. THE ARTICLE¿S FINDINGS INCLUDED REVIEWS OF THE PATIENTS FOLLOWING IMPLANT AND SIX-MONTH FOLLOW-UPS. THE STUDY POPULATION INCLUDED 44 PATIENTS WHO WERE IMPLANTED WITH A MODEL OF THIS BIOPROSTHESIS. THE AVERAGE PATIENT AGE WAS 72; 52% WERE FEMALE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 654709 | FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS | HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE | LWR | MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION | 995 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 00072 YR | Required Intervention |