EGIA ULTRA UNIVERSAL STAPLER
Report
- Report Number
- 2647580-2014-00863
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 14, 2014
- Date of Event
- September 12, 2014
- Report Date
- September 18, 2014
- Manufacturer
- COVIDIEN, FORMERLY USSC PUERTO RICO INC
- Product Code
- GDW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K083519
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4).
PROCEDURE: LAP COLON. ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: UPON ANASTOMOSIS OF COLON WITH ENDO GIA STAPLES, FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSTOMY REVEALED A LEAK. THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER ENDOSCOPIC STAPLER AND THE LEAK PERSISTED. THE LAP CASE NEEDED TO BE CONVERTED TO OPEN AND THE LEAK WAS REPAIRED USING A TA STAPLER. NO REINFORCEMENT. TISSUE WAS NORMAL THICKNESS; NON-INFLAMED RECTUM. PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED LAST WEEK AND IS DOING WELL. THE SURGEON CLAIMS THAT CASE WAS UNCOMPLICATED; THE ONLY REASON FOR OPENING WAS LACK OF CONFIDENCE IN THE ENDO GIA. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE LOSS. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE DAMAGE. THERE WAS A DELAY OVER 30 MINUTES BECAUSE CASE CONVERTED TO OPEN. THERE WAS NO UNANTICIPATED BLOOD LOSS OF MORE THAN 250CC. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: WAS THERE POOR STAPLE FORMATION: SHE SAID THE STAPLE FORMATION LOOKED GOOD BUT THAT IT OPENED UP LIKE A ZIPPER IN THE MIDDLE. SO, THE STAPLES WERE FORMED, BUT THE STAPLE LINE OPENED UP IN THE MIDDLE. WAS THE STAPLE LINE COMPLETE: YES. SHE BELIEVES IT WAS. WAS THE SAME STAPLER EGIAUSTND (LOT: P4D0814X) USED WITH ALL OF THE RELOADS RELATED TO THIS CASE: YES. IF NO, WHAT IS THE PRODUCT ID AND LOT NUMBER FOR THE HANDLE USED WITH EACH RELOAD. IF THE CUSTOMER CANNOT REPORT THE PRODUCT ID AND LOT NUMBER, WAS IT A LEGACY UNIVERSAL (SUCH AS 030403, 030449, EGIAUNIVXL), OR WAS IT AN EGIA ULTRA (SUCH AS EGIAUSHORT, EGIAUSTND, EGIAUXL). WILL THE DEVICE BE RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION AS REPORTED: AS I EXPRESSED IN THE E-MAIL THE FACILITY IS HAVING DISCUSSIONS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO RETURN THIS FOR OUR REVIEW. I WILL LET YOU KNOW WHEN THEY GET BACK TO ME. DESCRIBE THE TISSUE DAMAGE AND PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE DAMAGE WAS TREATED/CORRECTED: THE TISSUE DAMAGE OCCURRED WHEN A LAP PROCEDURE WAS TAKEN TO OPEN A. WAS THE DAMAGE IRREVERSIBLE: YES, YOU CAN'T UNDO AN OPEN PROCEDURE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE LAP 7. WAS ANY ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF ANY DELAY IN SURGERY: (I.E. AN EXTENSION OF THE HOSPITAL STAY, INFECTION, ETC.) RESPONSE FROM A NURSE: AS DR. (B)(6) MENTIONED EARLIER, THE SURGERY TIME WAS EXTENDED DUE TO THE NEED TO GO OPEN. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN BY ADVERSE EVENT BEING REPORTED. DO YOU MEAN TO THE STATE: OR JUST THROUGH THE HOSPITAL SYSTEM.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651358 | EGIA ULTRA UNIVERSAL STAPLER | DISPOSABLE SURGICAL STAPLER | GDW | COVIDIEN, FORMERLY USSC PUERTO RICO INC | EGIAUSTND | P4D0814X |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 YR | Other| R| S | EGIA60AMT, EGIA 60 ARTICULATING MED/THICK SULU, |