SURGIQUEST AIRSEAL
Report
- Report Number
- 3006217371-2014-00001
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- September 25, 2014
- Date of Event
- February 18, 2014
- Report Date
- August 26, 2014
- Manufacturer
- SURGIQUEST, INC.
- Product Code
- GCJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K103692
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE SURGIQUEST AIRSEAL IFS SYSTEM IS A LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESS SYSTEM USED TO CREATE AND MAINTAIN A PATH OF ENTRY FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY AND IS CLEARED UNDER 510 (K) [K103692]. WHILE THERE IS A REPORT OF PNEUMOTHORAX, THERE IS NO CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT REASONABLY SUGGESTS THAT USE OF THE AIRSEAL IFS WAS IN ANY WAY THE CAUSE OF THE CONDITION; NOR WAS THERE A CLAIM BY THE SURGEON THAT THE DEVICE WAS THE CAUSE. WHILE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT AIRSEAL IFS CAUSED THIS EVENT, THE COMPANY IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH 21 CFR PART 803. LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES HAVE LONG BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH THORACIC COMPLICATIONS INCLUDING PNEUMOTHORAX. PUBLISHED LITERATURE ON THE INCIDENCE OF PNEUMOTHORAX IS QUIRE VOLUMINOUS AND CONCLUDES THAT THERE ARE MANY AND VARIOUS REASONS WHY THIS CONDITION PRESENTS DURING OR FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PARTICULARLY, IN HIGHER RISK PATIENTS AND IN ANATOMICAL REGIONS WHERE THER IS A HIGH RISK OF VIOLATION OF ANATOMICAL SPACES PRONE TO CAUSE MIGRATION OF GAS INTO THE THORACIC CAVITY. IN THIS CASE, THE PT WAS (B)(6) THUS QUALIFYING THE PT AS HIGHER RISK BASED ON PUBLISHED LITERATURE. ADDITIONALLY, A PERITONEAL PRESSURE OF 15 MMHG WAS EMPLOYED DURING THE PROCEDURE AND THE LENGTH OF THE PROCEDURE WAS 4.5 HRS. FURTHERMORE, MULTIPLE TROCARS WERE USED IN THIS ADVANCED LAPAROSCOPIC CASE AND THE TECHNIQUE REQUIRED THE PLACEMENT OF OTHER MEDICAL DEVICES CLOSE TO THE DIAPHRAGM. HIGHER INSUFFLATION PRESSURES COMBINED WITH DEVICES IN PROXIMITY TO THE DIAPHRAGM INCREASE THE POTENTIAL FOR CREATING A RENT OR DEFECT IN THE PERITONEAL BARRIER THUS MAKING THE REPORTED CONDITION MORE LIKELY TO OCCUR. WHILE THE ROOT CAUSE IS UNK, IN LIGHT OF THE RISK FACTORS, THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE, LENGTH AND TECHNIQUE, WE BELIEVE THAT IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT THE USE OF THE AIRSEAL IFS WAS THE CAUSE OF THE POST-OPERATIVE CONDITION, BUT CANNOT SUBSTANTIATE OTHERWISE. THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN EMPLOYED IN APPROXIMATELY 200,000 SURGERIES TO DATE AND THERE HAVE BEEN NO REPORTABLE INCIDENTS RELATED TO ITS USE AND THE CREATION OF THIS CONDITION. WHILE IT APPEARS UNLIKELY THAT A USER FACILITY REPORT WILL BE FILED, THE COMPANY HAS TAKEN A PROACTIVE STANCE IN REPORTING TO FDA. THE COMPANY CONTINUES TO MONITOR THE CLINICAL USE OF AIRSEAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMPANY POLICY AND PROCEDURES AND WORKS DILIGENTLY TO IMPROVE PRODUCT SAFETY AND DESIGN AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S COMMITMENT TO CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
THE COMPANY WAS MADE AWARE ON (B)(6) 2014 THAT A PT AT (B)(6), RETURNED TO THE HOSP SOME WEEKS AFTER UNDERGOING TRANSPERITONEAL PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY AND WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A BRONCHIAL INFECTION. UPON CHEST X-RAY, PNEUMOTHORAX WAS DETECTED. THE PT WAS READMITTED AND A CHEST TUBE WAS INSERTED IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE PNEUMOTHORAX. THE CONDITION RESOLVED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. THE EVENT OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2014 PRECEDING THE REPORT AND AWARENESS DATE BY MORE THAN 6 MONTHS AND WAS NOT REPORTED AT THE TIME. THE DEVICE IN QUESTION IS STILL IN USE AT THE FACILITY. NO USER FACILITY REPORT HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 599481 | SURGIQUEST AIRSEAL | INSUFFLATOR | GCJ | SURGIQUEST, INC. | AS-IFS1 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58 YR | Hospitalization |