IAB : 8 FR - 40 CC FOS
Report
- Report Number
- 1219856-2014-00182
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- September 29, 2014
- Date of Event
- September 4, 2014
- Report Date
- September 4, 2014
- Manufacturer
- ARROW INTL., INC.
- Product Code
- DSP
- PMA / PMN Number
- K021462
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- MA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4).
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE RCIS IN THE CATH LAB CALLED TO TROUBLESHOOT "HE LOSS 2 ALARMS" ON THE INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP (S/N (B)(4)). THE RCIS STATED THE TANK WAS FINE AND THERE WAS NO BLOOD NOTED IN THE TUBING. THEY HAD ALREADY SWITCHED OUT THE MACHINE (FIRST MACHINE SN (B)(4)) AND THEY WERE STILL HAVING ALARMS. THEY HAD DECREASED THE VOLUME IN THE IAB (40CC) DOWN TO 30CC WITH NO CHANGE IN ALARMS. THE PT IS (B)(6) AND THEY ARE NOT SURE WHY THEY PUT IN A 40CC. THERE WAS NO BLOOD IN THE TUBING. THE CSS DISCUSSED WITH THE RCIS AND CHARGE RN HOW TO DETERMINE THE RIGHT VOLUME IN THE INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON (IAB) TO FIT THE AORTA AND THAT THIS DID NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THEY MAY STILL HAVE RENAL ARTERY OCCLUSION PROBLEMS DUE TO THE LENGTH OF THE 40CC MEMBRANE. THE CHARGE RN SENT THE CSS A STRIP. THE CHARGE RN STATED HE HAD TRIED OPERATOR MODE AND MULTIPLE TRIGGERS WITH NO IMPROVEMENT. HE ALSO STATED THE PATIENT HAD ENDOVASCULAR STENTING ON BOTH SIDES AND WONDERED IF THAT COULD HAVE CAUSED THE ABRASION DURING INSERTION. THE CSS AGREED THAT IT WAS POSSIBLE. AFTER LENGTHY DISCUSSION, THE CHARGE RN STATED THAT THERE WAS NO KINK EXTERNALLY OR VISIBLE. THE CSS DISCUSSED THAT THE BPW (BALLOON PRESSURE WAVEFORM) DID SHOW SOME DEGREE OF KINKING, WHICH COULD INDICATED THAT THIS WAS A POSSIBLE LEAK IN THE IAB. THE CHARGE RN STATED THAT WAS WHAT HE HAD BEEN TRYING TO TELL THEM. THE CSS DISCUSSED A LEAK TEST WITH THE CHARGE RN. THE CSS EXPLAINED THAT WILL ONLY PROVE THE ISSUE IF INSIDE THE CATHETER OR EXTERNAL TO THE PUMP. THE CSS STATED IT COULD BE KINK AND/OR LEAK RELATED AND EITHER WAS IF THE CATHETER FAILED THE RECOMMENDATION IS REMOVAL. THE CHARGE RN UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED. THE CHARGE RN STATED THEY WERE ONLY USING IT FOR INTERVENTION AND WERE GOING TO REMOVE IT RIGHT AFTER. HE DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE DOCTOR AND THE IAB WILL BE REMOVED, BUT NOT REPLACED. THE CHARGE RN STATED THAT THE PT WAS DOING FINE. THERE ARE NO COMPLICATIONS NOTED TO THE IAB. ADDITIONAL INFO RECEIVED STATED THAT THE MD KEPT THE SHEATH IN THE PATIENT BECAUSE IT WAS "THE BEST WAY FOR THEM TO RETAIN ACCESS AND MEANT THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO UPSIZE ON SHEATH. THIS PT HAD BIG ISSUES WITH LOSS OF PULSE."
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 606726 | IAB : 8 FR - 40 CC FOS | INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON FIBEROPTIC SYST | DSP | ARROW INTL., INC. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |