LIGACLIP CLIP APPLIER
Report
- Report Number
- 3005075853-2014-06620
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- September 23, 2014
- Date of Event
- September 8, 2014
- Report Date
- September 11, 2014
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
- Product Code
- GDO
- PMA / PMN Number
- EXEMPT
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- TU
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
(B)(4). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND THE FOLLOWING WAS OBTAINED: DID ANYTHING UNEXPECTED HAPPEN PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT? - NO. DID THE PROCEDURE DRIVE THE NEED TO APPLY TORQUE OR TWISTING OF THE DEVICE? ¿NO, BUT, TIPS OF THE APPLICATOR DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY AND THAT¿S WHY CAME CROSSED. WHAT VESSEL WAS THE DEVICE FIRED ON? PLEASE SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE VESSEL.-THIN VASCULAR VESSEL. HOW WAS "TRAUMA" REPAIRED?- LEAK WAS SUPPORTED BY POLYMER CLIP. WAS THERE ANY CHANGE TO PROCEDURE OR POST-OP PATIENT CARE?- NO. WHAT IS CURRENT PATIENT STATUS?- NORMAL. DID BLEEDING OCCUR? -YES. IF BLEEDING OCCURRED, HOW MUCH BLOOD DID THE PATIENT LOSE? -BLEEDING WAS LIKE A LEAKAGE, SMALL AMOUNT OF BLEEDING OCCURED. WAS A TRANSFUSION REQUIRED (WERE BLOOD PRODUCTS GIVEN)? -THERE WAS NO NEED FOR TRANSFUSION. WAS ANY FURTHER INTERVENTION REQUIRED TO REPAIR THE LEAK? -LEAK WAS SUPPORTED BY POLYMER CLIP. DID ANYTHING UNEXPECTED HAPPEN PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT? - NO. DID THE PROCEDURE DRIVE THE NEED TO APPLY TORQUE OR TWISTING OF THE DEVICE? ¿ NO. BUT, TIPS OF THE APPLICATOR DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY AND THAT¿S WHY CAME CROSSED. WHAT VESSEL WAS THE DEVICE FIRED ON? PLEASE SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE VESSEL. - THIN VASCULAR VESSEL. DID SCISSORED CLIPS CAUSE BLEEDING? ¿ YES, VERY FEW AMOUNT. WHAT IS CURRENT PATIENT STATUS? ¿ NORMAL. THE BLEEDING WAS ADDRESSED INTRA-OP AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED WITH POLYMER LIGALCIP AND WITH NO FURTHER COMPLICATION. PATIENT¿S POST-OP CARE DID NOT CHANGE. THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOUND THAT THE LX110 DEVICE WAS RECEIVED IN GOOD VISUAL CONDITION. IN AN ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THE REPORTED INCIDENT, THE DEVICE WAS TESTED FOR FUNCTIONALITY. UPON FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE DEVICE, THE INSTRUMENT LOADED, RETAINED AND DEPLOYED 6 CLIPS AS INTENDED. THE INSTRUMENT WAS FULLY FUNCTIONAL AND CONFORMING TO OUR MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS. NO CONCLUSION COULD BE REACHED AS TO WHAT MAY HAVE CAUSED THE REPORTED INCIDENT. THE BATCH HISTORY RECORDS WERE REVIEWED AND TESTED BY EXTERNAL MANUFACTURING THAT THE MANUFACTURING CRITERIA WAS MET PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF THE EQUIPMENT.
(B)(4). ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO RETRIEVE THE DEVICE. TO DATE THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED. IF THE DEVICE OR FURTHER DETAILS ARE RECEIVED AT A LATER DATE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SENT. AT THE TIME OF THIS SUBMISSION, THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. TO DATE NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN PROVIDED. IF FURTHER DETAILS ARE RECEIVED AT A LATER DATE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SENT. DID ANYTHING UNEXPECTED HAPPEN PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT? DID THE PROCEDURE DRIVE THE NEED TO APPLY TORQUE OR TWISTING OF THE DEVICE? WHAT VESSEL WAS THE DEVICE FIRED ON? PLEASE SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE VESSEL. HOW WAS "TRAUMA" REPAIRED? WAS THERE ANY CHANGE TO PROCEDURE OR POST-OP PATIENT CARE? WHAT IS CURRENT PATIENT STATUS?
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, WHILE THE LIGACLIP BEING COMPRESSED, IT DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY AND CAME CROSSED BECAUSE OF THE APPLICATOR. SMALL CLIPS CUT THE VESSEL, DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY. WHEN THE DOCTOR TOOK AWAY CROSSED CLIPS FROM THE PATIENT, IT CAUSED A LITTLE HARM ON PATIENT LIKE A PEN-NIB.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 589722 | LIGACLIP CLIP APPLIER | APPLIER, SURGICAL, CLIP | GDO | ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. | NA | K4CR1U |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLIPS - LT100 |