PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2014-06054
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- September 19, 2014
- Date of Event
- August 27, 2014
- Report Date
- August 27, 2014
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- KY, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. AGAINST RESISTANCE. PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, DO NOT ADVANCE OR WITHDRAW THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE AGAINST RESISTANCE UNTIL THE CAUSE OF THAT RESISTANCE HAS BEEN DETERMINED. EXCESSIVE FORCE USED TO ADVANCE OR TORQUE THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE SHOULD BE AVOIDED, AS THIS MAY LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT VESSEL DAMAGE AND/OR BREAKAGE OF THE DEVICE, WHICH MAY NECESSITATE INTERVENTION AND/OR SURGICAL REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE AND VESSEL REPAIR. THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT COMPLETE. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE REPORTED DIFFICULT TO DEPLOY THE FOOT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED AS THE RETURNED DEVICE NOTED THE LEVER WAS PARTIALLY CLOSED AND THE FOOT WAS DEPLOYED. REPORTED FOOT RETRACTION PROBLEM WAS CONFIRMED. BASED ON A VISUAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE RESULTS OF THE QUERY OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS IN THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE FOR THIS LOT DID NOT INDICATE A MANUFACTURING ISSUE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROGLIDE WAS USED AGAINST RESISTANCE. THE PROGLIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE STATES, DO NOT ADVANCE OR WITHDRAW THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE SMC DEVICE AGAINST RESISTANCE UNTIL THE CAUSE OF THAT RESISTANCE HAS BEEN DETERMINED. EXCESSIVE FORCE USED TO ADVANCE OR TORQUE THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE SMC DEVICE SHOULD BE AVOIDED, AS THIS MAY LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT VESSEL DAMAGE AND/OR BREAKAGE OF THE DEVICE, WHICH MAY NECESSITATE INTERVENTION AND/OR SURGICAL REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE AND VESSEL REPAIR.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WAS ATTEMPTED USING A PROGLIDE DEVICE WITH A 6FR SHEATH, AFTER A HEART CATHETERIZATION INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THE FOOT PLATE DID NOT DEPLOY PROPERLY, RESISTANCE WAS FELT. THE NEEDLES WERE DEPLOYED; HOWEVER, WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE DEVICE, THE FOOT PLATE WOULD NOT RETRACT. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITH THE FOOT IN THE OPEN POSITION, NO VESSEL DAMAGE WAS NOTED. AN 8FR SHEATH WAS USED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THE PHYSICIAN IS REPORTED TO BE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 584123 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 40721K1 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 YR | Required Intervention | SHEATH: 6FR, 8FR, ANGIOMAX |