Description of Event or Problem · 1
I UNDERWENT ROBOTIC PROSTATE SURGERY AT (B)(6) WITH (B)(6) (NOW AT (B)(6)) ON (B)(6) 2010. OPERATING NOTES SHOWED PERFECT RESULTS. I LATER DISCOVERED USING OUTSIDE UROLOGIST, THAT MY URINARY SPHINCTER HAD BEEN CUT FROM 2 TO 8 O'CLOCK, AND WAS AN OBVIOUS DEFECT WITHOUT ANY HOPE OF RECOVERY. I SUPPLIED (B)(6) WITH THE FINDINGS AND THE UROLOGIST REPORT, WHICH HE RUDELY DISREGARDS AND FAILED TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR ACCOUNTABILITY. I ASKED HOW THIS OP NOTES SHOWED NO TRACE OF ANY ISSUES, TO WHICH HE MADE DEFLECTIVE STATEMENTS. HIS ACTIONS REFLECT THAT OF GUILT AND COVERING UP ADVERSE EVENTS. I APPROACHED THE HOSP WITH THE SAME RESULTS AS THEY POINTED OUT THAT THE OPERATING NOTES SHOWED NO ISSUES. I AM PROOF THAT THERE WERE ADVERSE RESULTS, BEING DESCRIBED AS UNIVERSALLY INCONTINENT AND IMPOTENT DUE TO ROBOTIC SURGERY. (B)(6) HAS CHOSEN TO COVER UP THE NEGATIVE OUTCOME.