SMART CONTROL NITINOL STENT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 9616099-2014-00507
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 1, 2014
- Date of Event
- July 2, 2014
- Report Date
- July 10, 2014
- Manufacturer
- CORDIS DE MEXICO
- Product Code
- FGE
- PMA / PMN Number
- K042969
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW WAS PERFORMED AND SHOWED THAT THIS LOT OF PRODUCTS MET ALL REQUIREMENTS PER THE APPLICABLE MANUFACTURING QUALITY PLAN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT.
COMPLAINT CONCLUSION: APPROXIMATELY 13 MONTHS AFTER HAVING A SMART STENT IMPLANTED IN THE SUPERFICIAL ARTERY THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVASCULARIZATION BY BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY SECONDARY TO RESTENOSIS. THE PATIENT WAS TAKING ASPIRIN AND CLOPIDOGREL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW SHOWED NO ISSUES WERE NOTED THAT WERE CONSIDERED POTENTIALLY RELATED TO THE REPORTED COMPLAINT. IN-STENT RESTENOSIS (ISR) IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROGRESSION OF ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE AND IS A KNOWN POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING STENT IMPLANTATION AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A DEVICE FAILURE. INTRA-ARTERIAL STENT PLACEMENT IS A TREATMENT OF THE DISEASE PROCESS, IT IS NOT A PREVENTIVE OR CURE FOR THE PROGRESSION OF SYMPTOMS OF ATHEROSCLEROTIC ARTERY DISEASE. VESSEL OCCLUSION, RESTENOSIS, INTIMAL HYPERPLASIA OR RECURRENT STRICTURES ARE WELL KNOWN DOCUMENTED POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS OF THIS TYPE OF PROCEDURE AND ARE LISTED IN THE IFU AS SUCH. IN THE LITERATURE, IN-STENT STENOSIS RATES RANGE FROM 11% TO 39% FROM 6 TO 12 MONTHS AFTER STENT PLACEMENT. RATES WERE HIGHER IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH MORE SEVERE ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND DEPENDED ON THE TYPE OF STENOSIS TREATED. ISR IS MORE PREVALENT IN OSTIAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURES. STENOSES IN STENTS ARE USUALLY TREATED WITH INTRASTENT PTA OR PLACEMENT OF A SECOND STENT. FACTORS THAT MAY HAVE INFLUENCED THIS EVENT INCLUDE PATIENT, PROCEDURAL, PHARMACOLOGICAL AND LESION. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. BASED ON THE LACK OF INFORMATION AND THE INABILITY TO ASSIGN OR DETERMINE A ROOT CAUSE NO CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WILL BE TAKEN AT THIS TIME.
AS REPORTED BY THE QUAL REP, RESTENOSIS WAS FOUND IN THE PLACED 6X150MM SMART STENT. THE SMART STENT WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2013 WITH ANY PROBLEM IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. ON (B)(6) 2014, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVASCULARIZATION BY POBA. THE PATIENT IS NOW IN GOOD CONDITION. THE PATIENT DID NOT PRESENT WITH ANY SYMPTOMS RELATING TO THE RESTENOSIS. THE PATIENT¿S MEDICAL HISTORY IS UNKNOWN. ONLY ONE STENT HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED IN THE AREA OF REVASCULARIZATION. THE PATIENT WAS ON COMPLAINT ON ASPIRIN AND CLOPIDOGREL.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451126 | SMART CONTROL NITINOL STENT SYSTEM | SELF EXPANDING STENTS (FGE) | FGE | CORDIS DE MEXICO | 15845064 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82 YR | Life Threatening| R |