FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

HYDRA JAGWIRE?

MDR report key: 3973082 · Received August 1, 2014

Report

Report Number
3005099803-2014-02597
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
August 1, 2014
Date of Event
July 7, 2014
Report Date
July 7, 2014
Manufacturer
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
Product Code
EZB
PMA / PMN Number
EXEMPT
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

PATIENT'S EXACT AGE IS UNKNOWN; HOWEVER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS OVER 18 YEARS OLD. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE SUSPECT DEVICE LOT NUMBER; THEREFORE, THE LOT EXPIRATION AND DEVICE MANUFACTURE DATES ARE UNKNOWN. THE COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE DEVICE WAS DISPOSED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION; THEREFORE, A FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. IF ANY FURTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION IS IDENTIFIED, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO ONE OF TWO DEVICES USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT #3005099803-2014-02597 AND 3005099803-2014-02648 FOR THE OTHER ASSOCIATED DEVICE INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX ENTERAL COLONIC STENT AND A HYDRA JAGWIRE GUIDEWIRE WERE USED IN THE SIGMOID COLON DURING A COLONIC STENTING PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2014. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE STENT WAS BEING IMPLANTED AS A BRIDGE TO SURGERY TO TREAT A 5CM STRICTURE DUE TO A MALIGNANCY. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE PATIENT HAS NEVER UNDERGONE CHEMOTHERAPY NOR RADIOTHERAPY. THE STAGE OF CANCER PROGRESSION PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE WAS STAGE II. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT'S TARGET ANATOMY OF THE SIGMOID WAS TORTUOUS. THE PATIENT FELT PAIN WHEN THE SCOPE WAS ADVANCED INTO THE COLON. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE HYDRA JAGWIRE WAS PLACED AT THE STRICTURE SITE AFTER SOME DIFFICULTY ADVANCING. THE STENT WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET SITE AND THE PHYSICIAN BEGAN RELEASING THE STENT BUT RECONSTRAINED THE STENT ONCE DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN THEN DEPLOYED THE STENT. RADIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED AND NO SIGNS OF FREE AIR WERE DETECTED DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT. HOWEVER, AFTER THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S ABDOMEN WAS SWELLING. CT SCAN WAS IMMEDIATELY PERFORMED AND A PERFORATION WAS CONFIRMED AT THE DISTAL END OF THE STENT. SURGERY WAS IMMEDIATELY PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE STENT AND THE TUMOR, INCLUDING THE PERFORATED AREA. POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM THE ICU TO THE GENERAL WARD ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND WAS STILL UNDER OBSERVATION. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, IT WAS UNKNOWN WHICH OF THE DEVICES CAUSED THE PERFORATION OR WHEN THE PERFORATION OCCURRED DURING THE PROCEDURE. IN THE PHYSICIAN¿S ASSESSMENT, MANIPULATION OF THE DEVICES CONTRIBUTED TO THE PERFORATION SINCE THE ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
449494 HYDRA JAGWIRE? STYLET FOR CATHETER, GASTRO-UROLOGY EZB BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) M00556051

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Required Intervention