FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM

MDR report key: 3933071 · Received July 14, 2014

Report

Report Number
2024168-2014-04513
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
July 14, 2014
Date of Event
June 18, 2014
Report Date
June 19, 2014
Manufacturer
AV-TEMECULA-CT
Product Code
MGB
PMA / PMN Number
P960043
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
TX, US
Reporter Occupation
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). IT IS INDICATED THAT THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AND IS NOT RETURNING FOR EVALUATION; THEREFORE, A FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE CANNOT BE COMPLETED. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. RESULTS OF THE QUERY OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS IN THE COMPLAINT-HANDLING DATABASE FROM THIS LOT DID NOT INDICATE A LOT SPECIFIC PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. ELEVEN UNUSED STERILE PROGLIDE DEVICES WITH THE SAME LOT NUMBER, 40224K1, AS THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WERE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. FUNCTIONAL TESTING WAS PERFORMED AND THE DEVICES PASSED WITH ACCEPTABLE RESULTS. NO MANUFACTURING OR ABNORMAL OBSERVATIONS WERE DETECTED. A CAUSE FOR THE COMPLAINT DEVICE REPORTED EXPERIENCE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS FROM THE TESTED SAMPLES. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE OTHER THREE PROGLIDE DEVICES REFERENCED ARE BEING FILED UNDER SEPARATE MEDWATCH REPORT NUMBERS.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUFF MISSES OCCURRED DURING SUTURE PLACEMENT WITH TWO PROGLIDE DEVICES IN THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY USING THE PRECLOSE TECHNIQUE PRIOR TO A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR (PEVAR) PROCEDURE. THE ARTERIOTOMY WAS 6F. REPORTEDLY, DIFFICULTY WAS FELT ADVANCING THE PLUNGER TO THE BODY OF THE DEVICE. TWO ADDITIONAL PROGLIDE DEVICES WERE USED AND PRE-PLACEMENT OF THE SUTURES WAS SUCCESSFUL USING THE PRECLOSE TECHNIQUE. THE SHEATH WAS UPSIZED TO 14F SHEATH AND THE PEVAR WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE KNOTS OF THE TWO PRE-PLACED PROGLIDE SUTURES WERE ADVANCED TO THE ARTERY; HOWEVER, HEMOSTASIS WAS NOT ACHIEVED. HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED USING MANUAL ARTERIAL COMPRESSION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELAE AND NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN IS REPORTED TO BE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE AND ESTABLISHED IN THE PRECLOSE TECHNIQUE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
410859 PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE MGB AV-TEMECULA-CT 40224K1

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Required Intervention SHEATH: 6F, 14F