UNKNOWN HIP
Report
- Report Number
- 0001825034-2014-06004
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 9, 2014
- Date of Event
- May 18, 2014
- Report Date
- October 18, 2014
- Manufacturer
- BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
- Product Code
- KWA
- PMA / PMN Number
- PUNKNOWN
- Removal / Correction Number
- N/A
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SC, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THIS FOLLOW-UP REPORT IS BEING FILED TO RELAY ADDITIONAL AND CORRECTED INFORMATION, WHICH WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL MEDWATCH. CORRECTED INFORMATION: EVENT DESCRIPTION: PATIENT DID NOT UNDERGO LEFT FEMORAL RESURFACING ON (B)(6) 2006 OR A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2009.
THE PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION NECESSARY TO REVIEW MANUFACTURING HISTORY WAS NOT PROVIDED. CURRENT INFORMATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO PERMIT A CONCLUSION AS TO THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS COULD NOT BE COMPLETED WITH THE LIMITED INFORMATION PROVIDED. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION/EXPIRATION DATE - UNKNOWN. PMA/510(K) NUMBER - UNKNOWN. MANUFACTURE DATE ¿ UNKNOWN. EVENT IS BEING REPORTED TO FDA ON ONE MEDWATCH AS THE LIMITED INFORMATION AVAILABLE INDICATES THAT A REVISION PROCEDURE WILL OCCUR. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED REGARDING THE PROCEDURE, THE COMPLAINT WILL BE REASSESSED AND FURTHER MEDWATCH REPORTS WILL BE SUBMITTED, IF NECESSARY.
CURRENT INFORMATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO PERMIT A CONCLUSION AS TO THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT. REVIEW OF DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS SHOW THAT LOT RELEASED WITH NO RECORDED ANOMALY. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER 1 OF 2 MDR'S FILED FOR THE SAME PATIENT (REFERENCE 1825034-2014-06004 AND 08213).
CORRECTED DATA: EVENT DESCRIPTION ¿ PATIENT WAS NOT ENROLLED IN A CLINICAL STUDY. A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL REVIEW IDENTIFIED THE PATIENT¿S EVENT.
AS PART OF A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY, A PATIENT WAS IDENTIFIED WHO UNDERWENT RIGHT FEMORAL RESURFACING ON (B)(6) 2006. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED A REACTIVE STEM LINE INDICATIVE OF FEMORAL LOOSENING AND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2014.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT ENROLLED IN A CLINICAL STUDY UNDERWENT RIGHT FEMORAL RESURFACING PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2006. SUBSEQUENT RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED A REACTIVE STEM LINE INDICATIVE OF FEMORAL LOOSENING. A REVISION PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED; HOWEVER, NO REVISION PROCEDURE HAS BEEN REPORTED TO DATE. A REVIEW OF INVOICE HISTORY COULD NOT CONFIRM THE INITIAL SURGERY DATE.
AS PART OF A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY, A PATIENT WAS IDENTIFIED WHO UNDERWENT RIGHT FEMORAL RESURFACING ON (B)(6) 2006. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED A REACTIVE STEM LINE INDICATIVE OF FEMORAL LOOSENING AND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2014. A REVIEW OF INVOICE HISTORY COULD NOT CONFIRM THE INITIAL SURGERY DATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION FOR THE RIGHT FEMORAL RESURFACING PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2006. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON CLINICAL STUDY INDICATES PATIENT UNDERWENT LEFT FEMORAL RESURFACING ON (B)(6) 2006. FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED ON CLINICAL STUDY INDICATES A REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2009 ON AN UNKNOWN SIDE FOR AN UNKNOWN REASON.
AS PART OF A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY, A PATIENT WAS IDENTIFIED WHO UNDERWENT RIGHT FEMORAL RESURFACING ON (B)(6) 2006. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED A REACTIVE STEM LINE INDICATIVE OF FEMORAL LOOSENING AND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2014. A REVIEW OF INVOICE HISTORY COULD NOT CONFIRM THE INITIAL SURGERY DATE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401159 | UNKNOWN HIP | PROSTHESIS, HIP | KWA | BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS | N/A | UNKNOWN |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 YR | Hospitalization| R |