PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2014-03794
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 13, 2014
- Date of Event
- May 17, 2014
- Report Date
- May 19, 2014
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- WI, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4) EVALUATION SUMMARY: THE SUTURE MEDICATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE LEVER HAD BEEN CLOSED AND THE FOOT HAD BEEN RETRACTED INTO THE GUIDE. THE SUTURE WAS RETURNED OUTSIDE THE DEVICE AND THE PRE-TIED KNOT WAS FORMED. THE RAIL SUTURE END WAS CUT WITH THE DEVICE CUTTER. THE SUTURE LOOP WAS STILL IN THE SUTURE BEARING. BOTH CUFFS HAD BEEN ENGAGED WITH THE NEEDLES. THE REPORTED NEEDLE TO CUFF MISS COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED. BASED ON VISUAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. A QUERY OF THE COMPLAINT HISTORY OF THE REPORTED LOT DID NOT INDICATE A MANUFACTURING ISSUE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY.
(B)(4). THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE ADDITIONAL PROGLIDE DEVICE REFERENCED IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH REPORT NUMBER.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE LEFT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WAS ATTEMPTED USING A PROGLIDE DEVICE WITH A 6FR SHEATH AFTER A NEURO INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, A CUFF MISS OCCURRED. A SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED WITH THE SAME RESULTS. A THIRD PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THE PHYSICIAN IS REPORTED TO BE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIAL MEDWATCH REPORT, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED: THE DEVICES WERE USED IN THE PRECLOSE TECHNIQUE. THE PHYSICIAN IS ESTABLISHED IN THE PRECLOSE TECHNIQUE. USER FACILITY MEDWATCH STATING: EVENT DESC: AT THE CONCLUSION OF AN ANGIOGRAM, TWO DEVICES WERE USED TO ATTEMPT TO CLOSE A FEMORAL ARTERY. NEITHER DEVICE WOULD CLOSE THE ARTERY. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED AND THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED. THIS FACILITY HAS HAD A TOTAL OF FOUR SIMILAR EVENTS WITH THIS DEVICE. ALL FOUR DEVICES WERE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. ALL FOUR DEVICES HAD THE SAME LOT NUMBER.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 350897 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 40217K1 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62 YR | Required Intervention | SHEATH: 6FR, TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR |