EDWARDS SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Report
- Report Number
- 2015691-2014-01302
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 5, 2014
- Date of Event
- May 13, 2014
- Report Date
- May 14, 2014
- Manufacturer
- EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
- Product Code
- NPT
- PMA / PMN Number
- P110021
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, CONDUCTION SYSTEM INJURIES, WHICH MAY REQUIRE A PERMANENT PACEMAKER, ARE POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY, DEPLOYMENT OF THE PROSTHETIC VALVE, AND THE OVERALL TAVR PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE VALVE ACADEMIC RESEARCH CONSORTIUM (VARC) GUIDELINES, THE CLOSE ANATOMICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AORTIC VALVE COMPLEX AND THE BRANCHING ATRIOVENTRICULAR BUNDLE MAY PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THESE COMPLICATIONS OF THE TAVR PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO LITERATURE REVIEW, AND AS DOCUMENTED IN A TECHNICAL SUMMARY WRITTEN BY EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION DISTURBANCES AFTER TAVR ARE ASSOCIATED WITH MANY PATIENT RELATED AND PROCEDURAL RELATED FACTORS, INCLUDING PRE-OPERATIVE CO-MORBID STATUS, THE DEGREE AND BULKINESS OF AORTIC VALVE AND ANNULAR CALCIFICATION, INTER-VENTRICULAR SEPTAL THICKNESS, PRE-EXISTING ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMALITIES, THE DEPTH OF PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION, AND THE PROFILE OF THE IMPLANTED PROSTHESIS. UNLIKE CONVENTIONAL AVR, WHERE THERE MAY BE LOCALIZED TRAUMA DUE TO DECALCIFICATION OF THE ANNULUS AND/OR SUTURE PLACEMENT IN THE PROXIMITY OF THE AV NODE OR THE BUNDLES, TAVR MAY CAUSE CONDUCTION ABNORMALITIES THROUGH MECHANICAL IMPINGEMENT OF THE CONDUCTION SYSTEM BY THE PROSTHESIS. THE MECHANISMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEART BLOCK AFTER TAVR ARE WELL DOCUMENTED AND DESCRIBED IN THE LITERATURE. IT IS ALSO DOCUMENTED THAT PRE-EXISTING HEART BLOCK IS COMMON IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TAVR OR SURGICAL AVR AND ANOTHER 4-6 % WILL DEVELOP POSTOPERATIVE HEART BLOCK, POTENTIALLY REQUIRING A PERMANENT PACEMAKER. IN THIS CASE, THE CAUSE OF THE PATIENT¿S ASYSTOLE CANNOT BE CONFIRMED; HOWEVER, IT WAS THOUGHT BY THE PHYSICIAN TO BE DUE TO DAMAGE TO THE SA NODE CAUSED DURING VALVE DEPLOYMENT. THE IFU AND TRAINING MANUALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO INADEQUACIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH REGARDS TO WARNINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, AND THE DIRECTIONS/CONDITIONS FOR THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF THE DEVICE. COMPLAINT HISTORIES FOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS ARE REVIEWED AGAINST TRENDING CONTROL LIMITS ON A MONTHLY BASIS, AND ANY EXCURSIONS ABOVE THE CONTROL LIMITS ARE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED AS PART OF THIS MONTHLY REVIEW. NO CORRECTIVE OR PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.
POST TRANSAORTIC VALVE PLACEMENT, WHEN RAPID PACING WAS CEASED, THE PATIENT WENT INTO ASYSTOLE. THE PHYSICIAN FELT THAT THE SA NODE WAS DAMAGED DURING THE VALVE PLACEMENT. THE PATIENT WAS PLACED ON A TEMPORARY PACEMAKER, AND TWO DAYS POST PROCEDURE HAD A PERMANENT PACEMAKER (PPM) IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT HAD MILD NATIVE VALVE/LEAFLET CALCIFICATION, AND NO MITRAL ANNULAR CALCIFICATION (MAC). BAV WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT ISSUE. THE VALVE¿S PRE-DEPLOYMENT POSITION WAS 50:50 AND IT LANDED 40/60 AORTIC/VENTRICULAR POST DEPLOYMENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 330107 | EDWARDS SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE | AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED | NPT | EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES | 9000TFX23 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 91 YR | Required Intervention |