PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2014-03466
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 30, 2014
- Date of Event
- May 13, 2014
- Report Date
- May 13, 2014
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- GM
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). A FEMORAL VENOUS SHEATH WAS REPORTED TO BE NEXT TO THE ARTERIAL SHEATH DURING CLOSING. PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR PATIENTS WITH IPSILATERAL FEMORAL VENOUS SHEATH DURING THE CATHETERIZATION PROCEDURE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE OTHER PROGLIDE DEVICE REFERENCED IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH REPORT.
(B)(4). IT IS INDICATED THAT THE DEVICE IS NOT RETURNING FOR EVALUATION; THEREFORE A FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES FOR THIS LOT. A QUERY OF THE ELECTRONIC COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE REVEALED NO OTHER INCIDENTS FOR HEMOSTASIS REPORTED FROM THIS LOT. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO INDICATE THE PRESENCE OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SUTURE PLACEMENT WAS SUCCESSFUL WITH TWO PROGLIDE DEVICES IN THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY USING THE PRECLOSE TECHNIQUE PRIOR TO A MITRAL VALVE REPAIR (LH CLOSURE). THE ARTERIOTOMY WAS A 6F AND THE SHEATH WAS ULTIMATELY UPSIZED TO AN 18F SHEATH FOR THE MITRAL VALVE REPAIR. REPORTEDLY, AFTER THE MITRAL VALVE REPAIR THE SUTURES WERE PULLED DOWN TO THE VESSEL TO ATTEMPT HEMOSTASIS, BUT WAS NOT ACHIEVED. THE KNOT PUSHER WAS USED BUT HEMOSTASIS STILL WAS NOT ACHIEVED. A VENOUS SHEATH WAS REPORTED TO BE NEXT TO THE ARTERIAL SHEATH DURING CLOSING. A CUT-DOWN PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AND HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED USING A VASCULAR PATCH. DURING THE CUT-DOWN PROCEDURE IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SUTURES HAD NOT CAPTURED THE VENTRAL WALL OF THE VESSEL. BOTH SUTURES HAD CAPTURED THE INSIDE OF THE VESSEL DORSAL WALL RESULTING IN HEMOSTASIS NOT BEING ACHIEVED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELAE. NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED. THE PHYSICIAN IS IN-TRAINING IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 318446 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 40228K1 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention | SHEATH: 6F/8F/10F/12F/15F/18F, HEPARIN |