COREVALVE
Report
- Report Number
- 2025587-2014-00182
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- April 4, 2014
- Date of Event
- March 13, 2014
- Report Date
- July 21, 2014
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
- Product Code
- NPT
- PMA / PMN Number
- P130021
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NY, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE PRODUCT REMAINS IMPLANTED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED. WITHOUT THE RETURN OF THE PRODUCT, NO DEFINITIVE CONCLUSION CAN BE MADE REGARDING THE CLINICAL OBSERVATION. (B)(4).
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT HYPOTENSION WAS NOTED DURING THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE FIRST VALVE. THE VALVE WAS NOT ABLE TO BE IMPLANTED AND WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH MEDICATION, WHICH CAUSED SOME REBOUND HYPERTENSION. A SECOND VALVE WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. POST PROCEDURE, ENZYMES WERE ELEVATED AND ST SEGMENT ELEVATION WAS NOTED ON THE EKG. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH MEDICATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT HAD A PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTED DUE TO THE CONDUCTION DISTURBANCE (BBB) TWO DAYS POST IMPLANT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. (B)(4).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT ONE DAY POST INDEX PROCEDURE THE PATIENT WAS NOTED TO SUFFER FROM CARDIOGENIC SHOCK. THE PATIENT SHOWED SIGNS OF HYPOPERFUSION, ACIDOSIS AND LOW URINE OUTPUT WHICH WAS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE SEVERE PVL. THE THIRD VALVE WAS IMPLANTED THAT DAY AND THE PATIENT RECOVERED. TWO DAYS POST INITIAL VALVE IMPLANT COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB) WAS NOTED. ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (EP) WAS CONSULTED AND ADVISED PERMANENT PACEMAKER PLACEMENT WHICH WAS IMPLANTED TWELVE DAYS POST INDEX PROCEDURE. (B)(4). CORRECTION: THE DATE OF THE PACER IMPLANT HAS BEEN CORRECTED FROM THE PREVIOUS REPORT (TWO DAYS POST TO 12 DAYS POST IMPLANT).
THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD WAS REVIEWED AND SHOWED THAT THIS PRODUCT MET ALL MANUFACTURING SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRODUCT RELEASED FOR DISTRIBUTION. NO ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED THAT WOULD HAVE IMPACTED THIS EVENT. POSITIONING DIFFICULTIES ARE OFTEN INFLUENCED BY PATIENT ANATOMY AND USER TECHNIQUE, BUT A ROOT CAUSE OF THE LOW DEPLOYMENT DEPTH COULD NOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE DEVICE WAS RETRIEVED AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED WITH RESULTANT SEVERE PARAVALVULAR LEAK (PVL) DUE TO THE POSITIONING. A SECOND VALVE WAS IMPLANTED WITH MILD PVL. A MILD PVL HAS MINIMAL IMPACT ON A PATIENT AND IS GENERALLY DEEMED AN ACCEPTABLE RESIDUAL CONDITION.
IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS TRANSCATHETER BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (SN(B)(4)), THE VALVE WAS DEPLOYED TOO DEEP. AS THE VALVE WAS BEING MOVED INTO THE OPTIMAL IMPLANT POSITION WITH THE DELIVERY CATHETER SYSTEM (DCS), THE VALVE MOVED OUT OF THE ANNULUS INTO THE ASCENDING AORTA. THE VALVE WAS RETRIEVED THROUGH THE SHEATH AND DISCARDED. A SECOND VALVE (SN (B)(4)) WAS IMPLANTED SUPRA-ANNULAR WITH RESULTING MODERATE PARAVALVULAR LEAK (PVL). ONE DAY POST-IMPLANT THE PVL HAD INCREASED TO SEVERE. THE VALVE WAS SNARED AND MOVED INTO THE ASCENDING AORTA. ANOTHER VALVE (SN B143003) WAS IMPLANTED, WITH RESULTING MILD PVL. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 204075 | COREVALVE | AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED | NPT | MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION | MCS-P3-640 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 00065 YR | Required Intervention |