UNK V. MUELLER
Report
- Report Number
- 1038548-2014-00036
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- March 26, 2014
- Date of Event
- March 6, 2014
- Report Date
- March 26, 2014
- Manufacturer
- CAREFUSION
- Product Code
- FDG
- PMA / PMN Number
- EXEMPT
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- DC, US
- Reporter Occupation
- BIOMEDICAL ENGINEER
Narratives
(B)(4) FURTHER INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED BY THE SALES REP DURING HIS VISIT TO THE FACILITY ON (B)(6) 2014. THE SALES REP REPORTED THAT THERE WERE FOUR (4) TEBBETTS RETRACTORS USED IN THE CASE, WHICH IS TWO (2) MORE THEN ORIGINALLY REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER. THE LOT NUMBERS AND PRODUCT NUMBERS WERE UNKNOWN. THE HOSPITAL COULD NOT IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE FOUR TEBBETTS RETRACTOR WAS USED IN THE CASE. NO PHOTOS WERE TAKEN OF THE TEBBETTS RETRACTORS. THE BIO MED MANAGER TESTED ALL FOUR OF THE RETRACTORS AND DID NOT FIND ANY ISSUES. THE SALES REP WAS ABLE TO TAKE PICTURES OF THE LIGHT CABLE (PRODUCT CODE (B)(4),LOT NUMBER 833502) LISTED IN CASE (B)(4) WHOS INVESTIGATION CONCLUDED CREATED THE FAILURE.
(B)(4). SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED, A FOLLOW-UP EMDR WILL BE SUBMITTED.
DAMAGED PRODUCT MEDWATCH (B)(4). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER (B)(4) 2014. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT OUR TEBBETTS RETRACTORS WERE ATTACHED TO THE LIGHT SOURCE WHEN THE LIGHT SOURCE FRAYED AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT'S OPEN BREAST. HE DID NOT BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY PATIENT HARM. HE STATED HE HAD NO FURTHER INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. HE STATED THAT THE INSTRUMENTS WOULD NOT BE SENT FOR EVALUATION BUT DID OFFER TO ALLOW US TO COME TO THE FACILITY TO EVALUATED DURING A CUSTOMER VISIT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178057 | UNK V. MUELLER | RETRACTOR, FIBEROPTIC | FDG | CAREFUSION | UNK V. MUELLER |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44 YR | Other |