NEUROMAX 1000K
Report
- Report Number
- MW1022279
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- June 28, 2001
- Report Date
- June 28, 2001
- Manufacturer
- EXCEL TECH LTD
- Product Code
- IKN
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Voluntary report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
RPTR WROTE TO MFR CONCERNING THE FAILURE OF CO'S PRODUCT, EQUIPMENT#1 TO WORK PROPERLY. RPTR DESCRIBED THE DEFECT, THE HISTORY OF ATTEMPTS TO HAVE CO CORRECT THE DEFECT, AND THE FAILURE OF CO TO REMEDY THE SITUATION. MOREOVER, RPTR DESCRIBED THE THREAT TO PT HEALTH AND WELL-BEING POSED BY THE EQUIPMENT. ALTHOUGH RPTR HAS RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM CO, CO SENT A TECH TO INSPECT THE EQUIPMENT AGAIN. THE TECH NOTED THAT THE EQUIPMENT WAS CONNECTED TO THE WALL OUTLET BY AN EXTENSION WHICH HAD A DEFECTIVE "ON-LIGHT" AND RECOMMENDED REPLACEMENT. USER FOLLOWED TECH'S RECOMMENDATION TO REPLACE THE EXTENSION AND DETERMINED THAT THE EXTENSION WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR EQUIPMENT#1 DEFICIENCIES BECAUSE THE DEFICIENCIES CONTINUED. CO THEN DELIVERED EQUIPMENT#2, A USED UNIT MFG IN 9/99, WHICH BEARS A CERTIFICATION THAT IT MEETS US STANDARD 544, AND SHOWS SIGNS OF MODIFICATION TO THE WIRING. STAFF HAS ATTEMPTED TO USE EQUIPMENT#2 IN THE CLINICAL CARE OF PTS. IT IS UNACCEPTABLE BECAUSE: (I) IN NERVE TESTING, THERE IS A RANDOM INSERTION OF EXTRA LETTERS INTO TEXT GENERATED BY THE EQUIPMENT; AND (II) MORE IMPORTANT, IN EMG TESTING THERE ARE SPURIOUS ELECTRICAL SIGNALS (NOISE) WHICH MAKE INTERPRETATION OF THE EMG CLINICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. THE ELECTRIC LINE TO WHICH THE EQUIPMENT WAS CONNECTED WAS TESTED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN AND IS FREE OF SPURIOUS SIGNALS. A HIGH QUALITY LINE FILTER BROUGHT NO IMPROVMENT. WHEN EQUIPMENT#2 WAS MOVED TO A LEAD-LINED ROOM WITH A FILTERED ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IT SHOWED THE SAME NOISE AND DEFECTIVE TRACING, INDICATING THAT EXTRINSIC RADIO FREQUENCY AND LINE NOISE IS NOT A FACTOR IN THE FAILURE OF EQUIPMENT#2 TO PERFORM IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH ITS INTENDED PURPOSE AND SAFE FOR PTS. USER REASONABLY CONCLUDES THAT THE EQUIPMENT#1 AND EQUIPMENT#2 FAIL BECAUSE OF AN INHERENT DESIGN OR MFG FLAW AND ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON HUMAN SUBJECTS. USER QUESTIONS WHETHER CO'S CERTIFICATION ON THE EQUIPMENT THAT IT MEANS US STANDARD 544 IS ACCURATE AND TRUTHFUL. USER DEMANDS THAT CO IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT WITH EQUIPMENT WHICH CONTINUOUSLY MEETS THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS PUBLISHED FOR THE EQUIPMENT. IN ADDITION, CO IS TO BEAR THE COST OF ALL TESTING AND EXPENSES RELATED TO DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT.
EMG IS UNREADABLE CONFIRMED BY ENGINEERING AND MACHINE LOSES DATA AND THIS RESULTS IN ADD'L PAIN AND SUFFERING AS PTS HAVE TO HAVE PROCEDURE REPEATED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29418 | NEUROMAX 1000K | EMG | IKN | EXCEL TECH LTD | * | * | |
| 29419 | NEUROMAX 1000 | * | --- | * | * | * |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | * | Other |