ADEPT ADHESION REDUCTION SOLUTION
Report
- Report Number
- 2032282-2013-00066
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 2, 2013
- Date of Event
- May 1, 2011
- Report Date
- July 19, 2013
- Manufacturer
- BAXTER HEALTHCARE - VIENNA
- Product Code
- MCN
- PMA / PMN Number
- P050011
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AS
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4). BAXTER MEDICAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: INTRA-OPERATIVE INSTILLATION OF UP TO 1-LITER OF ANY LIQUID IN THE PERITONEAL CAVITY IS KNOWN TO RESULT IN LOCAL MECHANICAL EFFECTS, INCLUDING AN ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT, ABDOMINAL PAIN, AND URINARY RETENTION. THIS MAY OCCASIONALLY RESULT IN PROLONGATION OF THE USUAL, ROUTINE HOSPITAL STAY. ADEPT MAY CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE OCCURRENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE ABDOMINAL PAIN (DUE TO ABDOMINAL DISTENSION). A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED UPON RECEIPT AND EVALUATION OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
(B)(4). BAXTER (B)(4) HAS COMPLETED THE INVESTIGATION. SAMPLE EVALUATION AND BATCH REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS NO SAMPLE OR LOT NUMBER WAS AVAILABLE. NO TREND WAS IDENTIFIED. PER VIENNA, THE COMPLICATION IS DISCUSSED IN THE MEDICAL ASSESSMENT AND NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED AS IT CANNOT BE DETERMINED IF THE USE OF ADEPT CAUSED THE COMPLAINT. THE CASE WILL BE KEPT ON FILE FOR TRENDING PURPOSES.
FROM LITERATURE: NESBITT-HAWES, ERIN M ET AL. "URINARY RETENTION FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY WITH OR WITHOUT 4% ICODEXTRIN ANTI-ADHESION SOLUTION." AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY 2013; 53: 305-309. ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: URINARY RETENTION IS A RECOGNIZED COMPLICATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY. PREVIOUS WORK SHOWED AN ASSOCIATION WITH 4% ICODEXTRIN SOLUTION AND URINARY RETENTION. AIMS: TO DETERMINE THE INCIDENCE OF URINARY RETENTION FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY WITH OR WITHOUT THE USE OF 4% ICODEXTRIN. METHODS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF 147 WOMEN UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY FOR BENIGN PATHOLOGY. WOMEN HAD THEIR PLANNED LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE AND EITHER RECEIVED ICODEXTRIN SOLUTION OR NOTHING AS DETERMINED BY THEIR TREATING SURGEON AT THE TIME OF THE OPERATION. RESULTS: FROM MAY 2011 TO FEBRUARY 2012, 147 WOMEN WERE APPROACHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY; OF WHOM, 124 WOMEN WERE INCLUDED: 62 RECEIVED ICODEXTRIN AND 62 DID NOT. THE WOMEN IN THE NON-ICODEXTRIN GROUP WERE SIGNIFICANTLY OLDER (P = 0.007) AND HAD A HIGHER BMI (P = 0.03) THAN THOSE IN THE ICODEXTRIN GROUP. FOLLOWING SURGERY, 27/124 (21.8%) WOMEN HAD POST-OPERATIVE URINARY RETENTION. ICODEXTRIN WAS ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNIFICANTLY MORE URINARY RETENTION (P = 0.017), BUT DID NOT EXTEND HOSPITAL ADMISSION SIGNIFICANTLY (P = 0.14). THE ADMINISTRATION OF ICODEXTRIN WAS ASSOCIATED WITH RESECTION OF MODERATE- OR SEVERE-STAGE ENDOMETRIOSIS INVOLVING MULTIPLE SURGICAL SITES, WHEREAS WOMEN IN THE NON-ICODEXTRIN GROUP WERE MORE LIKELY TO BE HAVING A HYSTERECTOMY. CONCLUSIONS: IN THIS NON-RANDOMIZED STUDY, THERE WERE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE WOMEN WITH POST-OPERATIVE URINARY RETENTION WHEN ICODEXTRIN WAS USED; HOWEVER, THIS DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO AN EXTENDED HOSPITAL ADMISSION. WHILE THERE MAY BE CONFOUNDING FACTORS, WOMEN RECEIVING ICODEXTRIN SHOULD BE WARNED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF URINARY RETENTION POST-OPERATIVELY, BUT THAT THIS IS UNLIKELY TO AFFECT THEIR STAY IN HOSPITAL. ABDOMINAL PAIN CAUSING PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION PATIENT 1: UPON REVIEW OF THE ARTICLE, IT WAS IDENTIFIED TWO PATIENTS EXPERIENCED PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION DUE TO ABDOMINAL PAIN. THIS IS ONE OF TWO REPORTS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 363771 | ADEPT ADHESION REDUCTION SOLUTION | BARRIER, ABSORABLE, ADHESION | MCN | BAXTER HEALTHCARE - VIENNA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hospitalization| O |