VALIANT
Report
- Report Number
- 2953200-2013-01341
- Event Type
- Death
- Date Received
- July 10, 2013
- Date of Event
- January 1, 2013
- Report Date
- June 13, 2013
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR
- Product Code
- MIH
- PMA / PMN Number
- P100040
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CH
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4). RESULTS: INHERENT RISK OF PROCEDURE (RETROGRADE TYPE A DISSECTION, RUPTURE, STENT GRAFT MIGRATION, STENT COLLAPSE, ANEURYSMAL DEGENERATION, TYPE I ENDOLEAK, PARAPLEGIA, OCCLUSION, SURGICAL BYPASS, STENT GRAFT-INDUCED DISTAL RE-DISSECTION, SURGICAL CONVERSION); PATIENT'S CONDITION AFFECTED EFFECTIVENESS OF DEVICE (PRE-OPERATIVELY DISSECTED THORACIC AORTA); (UNKNOWN CAUSE OF THE EVENT). CONCLUSION: DEVICE FAILURE/LACK OF EFFECTIVENESS RELATED TO PATIENT CONDITION (PRE-OPERATIVELY DISSECTED THORACIC AORTA); (UNKNOWN CAUSE OF THE EVENT).
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE JOURNAL ARTICLE ENTITLED; RESTRICTIVE BARE STENT FOR PREVENTION OF STENT GRAFT-INDUCED DISTAL REDISSECTION AFTER THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR FOR TYPE B AORTIC DISSECTION. JIAXUAN FENG, MD, QINGSHENG LU, MD, ZHIQING ZHAO, MD, JUNMIN BAO, MD, XIANG FENG, MD, LEFENG QU, MD, JIAN ZHOU, PHD, AND ZAIPING JING, MD, SHANGHAI, CHINA (J VASC SURG 2013;57:44S-52S.) BACKGROUND: STENT GRAFT-INDUCED DISTAL REDISSECTION (SIDR) IS ONE OF THE MAJOR CONCERNS IN THE DURABILITY OF ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR FOR COMPLICATED STANFORD TYPE B AORTIC DISSECTION. THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MEANS OF PREVENTION OF THIS COMPLICATION REMAIN UNKNOWN. METHODS: FROM APRIL 1997 TO MARCH 2010, 674 PATIENTS WITH TYPE B AORTIC DISSECTIONS WERE TREATED PRIMARILY BY THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR (TEVAR) AT OUR CENTER. CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION IN THIS STUDY WERE TREATMENT PRIMARILY WITH TEVAR AND AN ESTIMATED MISMATCH RATE (RATIO OF DISTAL DIAMETER OF STENT GRAFT TO LONG DIAMETER OF TRUE LUMEN) GREATER THAN 120%. BY THIS PROTOCOL, 465 PATIENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THIS STUDY AND WERE RETROSPECTIVELY ANALYZED. AMONG THEM, 266 PATIENTS WERE TREATED IN THE ACUTE PHASE, AND 199 WERE T REATED IN THE CHRONIC PHASE. RESULTS: A TOTAL OF 311 PATIENTS WERE TREATED WITH STANDARD TEVAR AND 154 PATIENTS WITH EVARDRESTRICTIVE BARE STENT (RBS). THE PREOPERATIVE MISMATCH RATE (MEASURED AS THE PREOPERATIVE LONG DIAMETER OF THE TRUE LUMEN AT THE LEVEL OF THE INTENDED DISTAL END OF THE STENT GRAFT) OF THE SIDR WAS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE NON-SIDR (192.7 6 54.9% VS 131.9 6 10.4%; P < .05). THE FOLLOW-UP MISMATCH RATE OF THE SIDR WAS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE NON-SIDR (145.4 6 34.6 VS 120.3 6 16.1; P < .05). COMPARED WITH THE STANDARD TEVAR, TEVAR D RBS WAS ASSOCIATED WITH A LOWER INCIDENCE OF SIDR (0% VS 2.9%; P[.033) AND LESS SECONDARY INTERVENTION (3.9% VS 9.3%; P[.040).PLACEMENT OF THE RBS SIGNIFICANTLY EXPANDED THE TRUE LUMEN AT THE LEVEL OF THE DESCENDING AORTA WITH THE NARROWEST TRUE LUMEN AND AT THE LEVEL OF THE DISTAL END OF THE STENT GRAFT. CONCLUSIONS: THE MISMATCH BETWEEN THE DISTAL DIAMETER OF THE STENT GRAFT AND THE DIAMETER OF THE COMPRESSED TRUE LUMEN SEEMS TO BE THE MAJOR FACTOR IN THE OCCURRENCE OF SIDR. PLACEMENT OF AN RBS, AS AN ADJUNCTIVE TECHNIQUE TO TEVAR, COULD REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SIDR. ON THE BASIS OF EARLY- TO MIDTERM OBSERVATIONS, RBSS MAY IMPROVE MORPHOLOGICAL REMODELING OF THE DISSECTED AORTA AT CERTAIN LEVELS. (J VASC SURG 2013;57:44S-52S.) IT WAS DOCUMENTED THAT PATIENT (5) HAD AN ONSET OF STENT GRAFT-INDUCED DISTAL RE-DISSECTION 33 MONTHS POST INDEX PROCEDURE, WHICH RESULTED IN A RE-DISSECTION. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH TEVAR.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 316971 | VALIANT | SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT | MIH | MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 00065 YR | Required Intervention |